Home / Metros / Sacramento

Metro cost profile · 2024 BEA RPP

Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA

Cost-of-living indicators for Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA, from Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Price Parities, overall, goods, services, and rents vs the U.S. average of 100.

106.7
Overall RPP
#22
of 387 metros
130.2
Rents RPP
$94K
$100K national buys

Sacramento ranks #22 of 387 U.S. metros by cost, and its overall price index has risen 5.4 points since 2008.

  • rising since 2008
  • similar cost to Bridgeport-Stamford-Danbury

The verdict

Sacramento is more expensive than 94% of U.S. metros, an overall cost index of 106.7, 6.7% above the national average, led by services at 151.3.

top 6%
by overall cost, nationwide
105.2
goods RPP, tradable items
151.3
services RPP, labor-priced

A $100,000 national salary carries the purchasing power of about $93,747 here; matching a $100K lifestyle takes roughly $106,670.

Latest BEA release change

What changed from 2023 to 2024

Sacramento's overall RPP fell -2.4 points, from 109.1 in 2023 to 106.7 in 2024. The largest category movement was services, changing from 138.3 to 151.3. This is a relative change against the national benchmark, not a household's dollar bill.

RPP History (2008-2024)

The cost of living has been trending upward, increasing by 5.4 points over this period. The largest single-year move was in 2018, when the index jumped 5.3 points from the year before.

Sacramento overall RPP, 2008-2024

Every year on record, national average = 100

Up 5.4 pts
100105110115 20082024 101 107 ▲ +5.3%
Year Overall
2008 101.3
2009 105.2
2010 102.8
2011 104.9
2012 104.9
2013 103.3
2014 103.1
2015 101.2
2016 101.1
2017 103.6
2018 108.9
2019 107.4
2020 107.0
2021 106.3
2022 109.9
2023 109.1
2024 106.7

Sacramento vs every U.S. metro

Where this metro sits in the national cost distribution

107 Top 6% higher than 94% of 387 US metros

80–84: 3 US metros (1%). Below this entry. 84–88: 48 US metros (12%). Below this entry. 88–92: 94 US metros (24%). Below this entry. 92–96: 97 US metros (25%). Below this entry. 96–100: 55 US metros (14%). Below this entry. 100–104: 54 US metros (14%). Below this entry. 104–108: 17 US metros (4%). This entry sits in this band. 108–112: 14 US metros (4%). Above this entry. 112–116: 5 US metros (1%). Above this entry. 116–120: 0 US metros (0%). Above this entry. This metro 80 120 every US metro, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US metros. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities · 2024

Sacramento cost breakdown

BEA RPP by category, 100 = national average

RPP

What this shows Sacramento's strongest departure is services at 151.3; rents follows at 130.2. Labor-priced local activity, rather than housing alone, is the first budget line to investigate.

Source U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities As of 2024

Goods vs. housing, where Sacramento's cost comes from

Metros near Sacramento's overall cost, plotted by their goods price (horizontal) and housing price (vertical). Same headline RPP, very different structures.

Crosshairs sit at the group median (goods 101.4, rents 134.2). Sacramento is skewed toward everyday-goods costs relative to its peer group. Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities, 2024. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 7 entities by Goods RPP (tradable items) → (X) and Rents RPP (housing) → (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Pricier on bothMore housing-ledMore goods-ledCheaper on both 9698100102104106 125130135140145150155 Goods RPP (tradable items) → Rents RPP (housing) → SacramentoBridgeportRiversideDenverManchesterBremertonSanta Rosa
Crosshairs sit at the group median (goods 101.4, rents 134.2). Sacramento is skewed toward everyday-goods costs relative to its peer group. Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities, 2024.
Read the chart as text
  • Sacramento (Sacramento, this metro): goods RPP 105.2, rents RPP 130.2
  • Bridgeport: goods RPP 97.3, rents RPP 150.5
  • Riverside: goods RPP 101.4, rents RPP 129.3
  • Denver: goods RPP 101, rents RPP 146.9
  • Manchester: goods RPP 97.7, rents RPP 134.2
  • Bremerton: goods RPP 105, rents RPP 129.6
  • Santa Rosa: goods RPP 105.2, rents RPP 139.6

Price Index Summary

Overall

106.7

Above avg

Goods

105.2

Above avg

Services

151.3

Expensive

Rents

130.2

Expensive

Service-cost-led profile

How Sacramento's cost structure works

Services are the defining pressure in Sacramento: the BEA services component is 151.3, farther above the national baseline than local rents or tradable goods. That service-heavy pattern explains an overall RPP of 106.7 differently from a housing-led metro.

Across all reported metros, the closest component-profile matches are Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA, Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA, New Haven, CT. They resemble Sacramento across goods, services, and rents together, so they are stronger structure peers than a place selected only because its overall RPP happens to be nearby.

Across 2008-2024, Sacramento's overall index has risen by 5.4 points. This is a relative price-level history, not a prediction or a personal affordability recommendation; pair it with current local wages and housing options before making a decision.

Salary Equivalent

A $100,000 salary at the national average cost of living equals:

$106,670

in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA purchasing power

$50,000 nationally
$53,335
$75,000 nationally
$80,003
$125,000 nationally
$133,338
$150,000 nationally
$160,005
$200,000 nationally
$213,340

Use the salary calculator for custom amounts.

Affordability score

F
6/100

How far the median local paycheck goes here, combining income and housing cost

Purchasing power
Not reported
Housing affordability F
6th percentile

A weighted composite (60% purchasing power, 40% housing affordability) percentile-ranked against every other tracked metro; a missing input redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. Sources: Census ACS 5-Year 2023 (income) + BEA Regional Price Parities 2024 (cost). Vintages differ by design; see methodology.

CA-relative analysis

Goods prices places Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA near the bottom of CA's metros

Among the 25 CA metros PlainCost tracks with reported goods prices data, Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA ranks #4 - the 4th percentile within the state. This is a different, narrower cut than the nationwide rank above: it compares Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA only against its own state's metros, not the full US field.

Goods prices
#4 of 25
4th percentile in CA
Services prices
#22 of 25
12th percentile in CA
Rent prices
#13 of 25
48th percentile in CA

Ranked by raw value (highest first); a higher rank is not automatically "more expensive is worse", see the national comparison above for direction context. This is a comparison within CA only, not a livability score.

Nationwide metros with similar overall cost or rent prices

Two BEA RPP-derived peer sets for Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA: nearest metros by overall regional price parity and by rents RPP. These are cross-state neighborhoods, not the in-state metro list below.

Decision peers

Metros with a similar cost mix

These metros are closest to Sacramento's combined goods, services, and rents profile. They may not have the same overall RPP, but their price pressures are shaped in a similar way.

Metros with Similar Cost of Living

These metros have an overall RPP closest to Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA's index of 106.7.

Showing the 6 closest of 387 metro areas tracked nationally.

Shareable PlainCost cost snapshot for Sacramento cost of living snapshot

Shareable data card

Take this cost snapshot with you

Download the data card or share this exact metro record. The card uses the same BEA-derived values shown above.

Cost of living guides →, cheapest and most-expensive metro rankings, salary negotiation with RPP data, and step-by-step comparison walkthroughs.

What this means for Sacramento

How to read Sacramento's cost of living before a move, a job offer, or a budget.

  • Budget to local prices, not headline pay, a $100K national salary spends like about $93,747 in Sacramento. Salary calculator
  • Start with services: it indexes at 151.3, the largest departure from the national benchmark in this metro's BEA cost mix. Compare it with the other components before treating the overall RPP as a complete household budget.
  • Compare Sacramento head-to-head against a specific destination before you decide. Compare metros

RPP is BEA's annual price-level benchmark for the data year shown, not a live market quote. Pair it with current local wages and housing costs before deciding.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the cost of living in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA?

Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA has a Regional Price Parity (RPP) index of 106.7, meaning it is 6.7% more expensive than the national average. Goods are indexed at 105.2, services at 151.3, and rents at 130.2. It ranks #22 out of 387 U.S. metro areas by overall cost.

What salary do I need in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA to match $100K nationally?

To maintain the same purchasing power as a $100,000 salary at the national average, you would need approximately $106,670 in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA. Conversely, $100K earned in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA has the purchasing power of $93,747 at the national average.

How expensive is rent in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA?

Rents in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA are indexed at 130.2, which is 30.2% above the national average. This is significantly higher than typical U.S. rents.

Is Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA getting more expensive?

From 2008 to 2024, Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA's overall cost index changed by +5.4 points (from 101.3 to 106.7). The cost of living has been trending upward.

What costs the most in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA?

The priciest category in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA is services at 151.3, 51.3% above the national average. The most affordable category is goods at 105.2, 5.2% above average, still the lowest of the three categories.

What metros have a similar cost of living to Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA?

Metros with the most similar overall cost index include Bridgeport-Stamford-Danbury, Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Denver-Aurora-Centennial. These areas have RPP values within a few points of Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA's 106.7.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities by Metropolitan Statistical Area (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.