Home / States / Montana

State cost profile · 2024 BEA RPP

Cost of Living in Montana

Statewide Regional Price Parities for Montana from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, overall, goods, services, and rents vs the U.S. average of 100, across 5 metro areas.

94.6
Statewide RPP
#30
of 51 states by cost
84.6
Rents RPP
5
Metro areas

Montana ranks #30 of 51 states by cost, and its statewide price index has held steady since 2008.

  • stable since 2008
  • rose +3.6 points in the 2023-2024 release
  • similar cost to North Carolina

The verdict

Montana costs less than 59% of U.S. states, a statewide index of 94.6, 5.4% below the national average.

Services
furthest category from 100, at 72.3
North Carolina
closest statewide cost peer, 0.3 points away
Bozeman
highest-cost metro, 102.5
Billings
lowest-cost metro, 93.5

A $100,000 national salary carries the purchasing power of about $105,658 when earned in Montana.

94.6
Overall
Below avg
96.0
Goods
Below avg
72.3
Services
Cheap
84.6
Rents
Cheap

Montana RPP history, 2008–2024

The statewide index has changed by only 0.6 points from 2008 to 2024. The line shows every retained BEA release against the national benchmark of 100; the table preserves the component detail.

8890929496 20082024 94.1 94.6 ▲ +0.6%
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities · 2008–2024
Year Overall
2008 94.1
2009 93.2
2010 92.4
2011 94.2
2012 93.2
2013 92.9
2014 95.2
2015 95.0
2016 93.9
2017 94.2
2018 92.4
2019 94.2
2020 92.0
2021 91.3
2022 90.2
2023 91.0
2024 94.6

Reading the Montana Cost of Living Picture

Montana sits in an affordability lane closest to North Carolina, Wisconsin, Idaho. A lower statewide index does not mean every place or budget category is cheap; it means this state belongs with those peers before a household narrows to a metro. Its category range is 23.8 points: large enough to separate housing-sensitive and service-heavy budgets, but not a single-component outlier.

Montana captures 5 metro areas in the BEA dataset, and the range across them is meaningful. Bozeman, MT leads on cost at 102.5, while Billings, MT sits at the opposite end at 93.5 - a gap of 9.0 index points inside a single state. For goods the state indexes at 96.0, for services 72.3, and for rents 84.6. Rents sit within 10.0 points of the statewide index, so no single category is distorting the headline — unusual, and it makes the state number more transferable between households than most.

Over time, Montana's statewide index has held steady within 0.6 points, suggesting a stable competitive position against other states. Practically, this means a $100,000 national salary delivers the purchasing power of about $105,658 of national buying power when earned inside Montana, and a household relocating here would need roughly $94,645 to reproduce a $100K lifestyle. With 5 reporting metros inside the state, treat this figure as the midpoint of a range rather than a quote for any one address.

Montana vs every U.S. state

Where this state sits in the national cost distribution

95 Bottom 41% higher than 41% of 51 US states

84–87: 2 US states (4%). Below this entry. 87–90: 7 US states (14%). Below this entry. 90–93: 8 US states (16%). Below this entry. 93–96: 6 US states (12%). This entry sits in this band. 96–99: 8 US states (16%). Above this entry. 99–102: 5 US states (10%). Above this entry. 102–105: 8 US states (16%). Above this entry. 105–108: 3 US states (6%). Above this entry. 108–111: 4 US states (8%). Above this entry. 111–114: 0 US states (0%). Above this entry. 114–117: 0 US states (0%). Above this entry. This state 84 117 every US state (incl. DC), bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US states. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities · 2024

Latest BEA release change

What changed from 2023 to 2024

Montana's overall RPP rose +3.6 points, from 91.0 in 2023 to 94.6 in 2024. The largest category move was rents, changing from 76.8 to 84.6. RPP is a relative price index, so this reports a change against the national benchmark rather than a household's dollar bill.

Rent spread across Montana's metros

Rents RPP, 100 = national rent average, sorted by rents rather than overall cost

  1. 1
    Bozeman 139.2 Rents RPP
    Overall 102.5
  2. 2
    Great Falls 97.1 Rents RPP
    Overall 96.8
  3. 3
    Missoula 94.9 Rents RPP
    Overall 96.4
  4. 4
    Helena 90.1 Rents RPP
    Overall 95.7
  5. 5
    Billings 77.4 Rents RPP
    Overall 93.5

Source U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities · 2024

Metro areas in Montana, ranked by cost

#Metro areaOverallGoodsServicesRents
1Bozeman102.596.073.6139.2
2Great Falls96.896.073.097.1
3Missoula96.496.072.194.9
4Helena95.796.072.690.1
5Billings93.596.072.477.4

The Rents RPP index measures housing costs relative to the national average (100). For the federal 40th-percentile Fair Market Rent by bedroom size and county, see the HUD Fair Market Rents dataset.

What this means in Montana

The statewide index is a starting point, cost varies metro to metro within Montana.

  • Don't rely on the state figure alone: Bozeman (102.5) and Billings (93.5) sit 9 index points apart inside Montana. Check your specific metro.
  • Rents index at 84.6 (15.4% below average) - the largest swing in the RPP. Review the housing line before any relocation decision. Highest rents
  • Weighing Montana against another state? Convert your salary to local purchasing power first. Salary calculator

RPP is BEA's annual price-level benchmark (national average = 100) for the data year shown, pair it with local wages and current rents before deciding.

Shareable PlainCost cost snapshot for Montana cost of living snapshot

Shareable data card

Take this cost snapshot with you

Download the data card or share this exact state profile. The card uses the same BEA-derived values shown above.

Cost of living guides →, cheapest and most-expensive rankings, cost of living vs wages, and how BEA constructs RPP data.

Nationwide states with similar overall cost or rent prices

Two BEA RPP-derived peer sets for Montana: nearest states by overall regional price parity and by rents RPP. These are labelled nationwide neighborhoods, distinct from the closest-RPP list above.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities Index where national average = 100

Frequently Asked Questions

How much cheaper is living in Montana than the U.S. average?

Montana has a Regional Price Parity (RPP) index of 94.6, meaning it is 5.4% less expensive than the national average. Goods are indexed at 96.0, services at 72.3, and rents at 84.6.

What salary in Montana equals $100K nationally?

To maintain the same purchasing power as a $100,000 salary at the national average, you would need approximately $94,645 in Montana. Conversely, $100K earned in Montana has the purchasing power of $105,658 at the national average.

Is housing expensive in Montana?

Rents in Montana are indexed at 84.6, which is 15.4% below the national average. The state is relatively affordable for renters.

Which is the most expensive metro in Montana?

The most expensive metro area in Montana is Bozeman, MT with an RPP of 102.5. The most affordable is Billings, MT at 93.5. There are 5 metro areas in Montana with BEA price data.

Is Montana getting more expensive?

From 2008 to 2024, Montana's overall cost index changed by +0.6 points (from 94.1 to 94.6). The cost of living has remained relatively stable.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities by State (2024), index where national average = 100. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2024. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.