Rochester vs Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington is 13.5% more expensive than Rochester.

13.5% more expensive

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX is 13.5% more expensive than Rochester, MN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.1 vs 90.8). A $100,000 salary in Rochester buys about the same as $113,509 in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 90.8 (Rochester) vs 103.1 (Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington)
  • $100k in Rochester ≈ $113,509 purchasing power in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
  • Rents drives the gap (+39.2 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair MN:TX 90.8→103.1

TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
  • CROSS-STATE MN × TX
  • RENT-LED Rent-led gap
  • BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Rochester would need to be in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington for the same purchasing power:

In Rochester In Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington Difference
$50,000 $56,754 +$6,754
$75,000 $85,132 +$10,132
$100,000 $113,509 +$13,509
$150,000 $170,263 +$20,263
$ in Rochester = in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.8 → 103.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Rochester, MN and Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 12.3 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.

This route crosses the national benchmark: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington is above 100 while Rochester is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.

Rents leads the difference, with Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington 39.2 points higher than Rochester. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Rochester corresponds to $113,509 in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Rochester
90.8
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
103.1
Goods
Rochester
95.4
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
102.8
Services
Rochester
87.4
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
90.7
Rents
Rochester
78.6
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
117.9

Vertical line = national average (100)

Rochester
90.8
Cost Index
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
103.1
Cost Index

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington more expensive than Rochester?

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington is 13.5% more expensive than Rochester. The overall cost index is 103.1 vs 90.8 (national average = 100).

What salary in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington equals $100K in Rochester?

A $100,000 salary in Rochester has the same purchasing power as $113,509 in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Rochester and Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington?

Rents in Rochester are indexed at 78.6 while Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington is at 117.9 (national average = 100). Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.