Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington vs Rochester

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Rochester is 11.9% less expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington.

11.9% less expensive

Rochester, MN is 11.9% less expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.8 vs 103.1). A $100,000 salary in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington buys about the same as $88,099 in Rochester; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 103.1 (Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington) vs 90.8 (Rochester)
  • $100k in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington ≈ $88,099 purchasing power in Rochester
  • Rents drives the gap (-39.2 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair TX:MN 103.1→90.8

TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
  • CROSS-STATE TX × MN
  • RENT-LED Rent-led gap
  • BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington would need to be in Rochester for the same purchasing power:

In Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington In Rochester Difference
$50,000 $44,049 $-5,951
$75,000 $66,074 $-8,926
$100,000 $88,099 $-11,901
$150,000 $132,148 $-17,852
$ in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington = in Rochester

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.1 → 90.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX and Rochester, MN sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 12.3 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.

This route crosses the national benchmark: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington is above 100 while Rochester is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.

Rents leads the difference, with Rochester 39.2 points lower than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington corresponds to $88,099 in Rochester.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
103.1
Rochester
90.8
Goods
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
102.8
Rochester
95.4
Services
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
90.7
Rochester
87.4
Rents
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
117.9
Rochester
78.6

Vertical line = national average (100)

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
103.1
Cost Index
Rochester
90.8
Cost Index

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Rochester more expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington?

Rochester is 11.9% less expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington. The overall cost index is 90.8 vs 103.1 (national average = 100).

What salary in Rochester equals $100K in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington?

A $100,000 salary in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington has the same purchasing power as $88,099 in Rochester. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington and Rochester?

Rents in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington are indexed at 117.9 while Rochester is at 78.6 (national average = 100). Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.