Overall
- Tuscaloosa
- 87.7
- Cleveland
- 88.1
Diff +0.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Cleveland is 0.4% more expensive than Tuscaloosa.
Cleveland, TN is 0.4% more expensive than Tuscaloosa, AL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 88.1 vs 87.7). A $100,000 salary in Tuscaloosa buys about the same as $100,408 in Cleveland; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair AL:TN 87.7→88.1
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Tuscaloosa, AL and Cleveland, TN are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Cleveland is 12.1 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Tuscaloosa to $100,408 in Cleveland, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.4 RPP
Diff -0.2 RPP
Diff -12.1 RPP
Diff +2.1 RPP
| Category | Tuscaloosa | Cleveland | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 87.7 | 88.1 | +0.4 |
| Goods | 96.4 | 96.2 | -0.2 |
| Services | 84.4 | 72.3 | -12.1 |
| Rents | 58.2 | 60.3 | +2.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Tuscaloosa and Cleveland share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 1.8 to 0.4 RPP points. Cleveland remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 4.3 points between the first and latest shared releases (16.4 to 12.1 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Tuscaloosa RPP | Cleveland RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 89.7 | 87.9 | 1.8 points Tuscaloosa higher |
| 2012 | 90.6 | 89.3 | 1.3 points Tuscaloosa higher |
| 2016 | 90.9 | 88.6 | 2.3 points Tuscaloosa higher |
| 2020 | 87.1 | 86.6 | 0.5 points Tuscaloosa higher |
| 2024 | 87.7 | 88.1 | 0.4 points Cleveland higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Tuscaloosa would need to be in Cleveland for the same purchasing power:
| In Tuscaloosa | In Cleveland | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,204 | +$204 |
| $75,000 | $75,306 | +$306 |
| $100,000 | $100,408 | +$408 |
| $150,000 | $150,612 | +$612 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (87.7 → 88.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Cleveland is 0.4% more expensive than Tuscaloosa. The overall cost index is 88.1 vs 87.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Tuscaloosa has the same purchasing power as $100,408 in Cleveland. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Tuscaloosa are indexed at 58.2 while Cleveland is at 60.3 (national average = 100). Cleveland has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.