Overall
- Tuscaloosa
- 87.7
- Farmington
- 87.7
Diff -0.0 RPP
Tuscaloosa vs Farmington
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Farmington is 0% less expensive than Tuscaloosa.
0% less expensive
Farmington, NM is 0% less expensive than Tuscaloosa, AL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 87.7 vs 87.7). A $100,000 salary in Tuscaloosa buys about the same as $99,983 in Farmington; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 87.7 (Tuscaloosa) vs 87.7 (Farmington)
- $100k in Tuscaloosa ≈ $99,983 purchasing power in Farmington
- Services drives the gap (-6.5 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair AL:NM 87.7→87.7
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE AL × NM
- SERVICES-LED Services-led gap
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Tuscaloosa
87.7
Cost Index
Farmington
87.7
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Tuscaloosa, AL and Farmington, NM are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.0 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services leads the difference, with Farmington 6.5 points lower than Tuscaloosa. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Tuscaloosa to $99,983 in Farmington, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Tuscaloosa
- 96.4
- Farmington
- 96.1
Diff -0.3 RPP
Services
- Tuscaloosa
- 84.4
- Farmington
- 77.9
Diff -6.5 RPP
Rents
- Tuscaloosa
- 58.2
- Farmington
- 56.6
Diff -1.7 RPP
| Category | Tuscaloosa | Farmington | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 87.7 | 87.7 | -0.0 |
| Goods | 96.4 | 96.1 | -0.3 |
| Services | 84.4 | 77.9 | -6.5 |
| Rents | 58.2 | 56.6 | -1.7 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Tuscaloosa 87.7
Farmington 87.7
Goods
Tuscaloosa 96.4
Farmington 96.1
Services
Tuscaloosa 84.4
Farmington 77.9
Rents
Tuscaloosa 58.2
Farmington 56.6
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Tuscaloosa would need to be in Farmington for the same purchasing power:
| In Tuscaloosa | In Farmington | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,991 | $-9 |
| $75,000 | $74,987 | $-13 |
| $100,000 | $99,983 | $-17 |
| $150,000 | $149,974 | $-26 |
$ in Tuscaloosa = in Farmington
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (87.7 → 87.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Farmington more expensive than Tuscaloosa?
Farmington is 0% less expensive than Tuscaloosa. The overall cost index is 87.7 vs 87.7 (national average = 100).
What salary in Farmington equals $100K in Tuscaloosa?
A $100,000 salary in Tuscaloosa has the same purchasing power as $99,983 in Farmington. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Tuscaloosa and Farmington?
Rents in Tuscaloosa are indexed at 58.2 while Farmington is at 56.6 (national average = 100). Tuscaloosa has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.