Overall
- Tuscaloosa
- 87.7
- Sumter
- 88.0
Diff +0.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Sumter is 0.3% more expensive than Tuscaloosa.
Sumter, SC is 0.3% more expensive than Tuscaloosa, AL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 88.0 vs 87.7). A $100,000 salary in Tuscaloosa buys about the same as $100,340 in Sumter; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair AL:SC 87.7→88.0
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Tuscaloosa, AL and Sumter, SC are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Sumter is 2.9 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Tuscaloosa to $100,340 in Sumter, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.3 RPP
Diff -0.1 RPP
Diff +2.9 RPP
Diff +2.6 RPP
| Category | Tuscaloosa | Sumter | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 87.7 | 88.0 | +0.3 |
| Goods | 96.4 | 96.3 | -0.1 |
| Services | 84.4 | 87.3 | +2.9 |
| Rents | 58.2 | 60.8 | +2.6 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Tuscaloosa and Sumter share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 0.3 to 0.3 RPP points. Sumter remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 8.6 points between the first and latest shared releases (6.0 to 2.6 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Tuscaloosa RPP | Sumter RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 89.7 | 89.4 | 0.3 points Tuscaloosa higher |
| 2012 | 90.6 | 89.6 | 1.0 points Tuscaloosa higher |
| 2016 | 90.9 | 87.1 | 3.8 points Tuscaloosa higher |
| 2020 | 87.1 | 81.4 | 5.7 points Tuscaloosa higher |
| 2024 | 87.7 | 88.0 | 0.3 points Sumter higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Tuscaloosa would need to be in Sumter for the same purchasing power:
| In Tuscaloosa | In Sumter | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,170 | +$170 |
| $75,000 | $75,255 | +$255 |
| $100,000 | $100,340 | +$340 |
| $150,000 | $150,510 | +$510 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (87.7 → 88.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Sumter is 0.3% more expensive than Tuscaloosa. The overall cost index is 88.0 vs 87.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Tuscaloosa has the same purchasing power as $100,340 in Sumter. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Tuscaloosa are indexed at 58.2 while Sumter is at 60.8 (national average = 100). Sumter has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.