Slidell-Mandeville-Covington vs Utica-Rome

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Utica-Rome is 0.1% less expensive than Slidell-Mandeville-Covington.

0.1% less expensive

Utica-Rome, NY is 0.1% less expensive than Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, LA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.7 vs 92.7). A $100,000 salary in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington buys about the same as $99,948 in Utica-Rome; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 92.7 (Slidell-Mandeville-Covington) vs 92.7 (Utica-Rome)
  • $100k in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington ≈ $99,948 purchasing power in Utica-Rome
  • Services drives the gap (+60.3 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair LA:NY 92.7→92.7

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE LA × NY
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
92.7
Cost Index
Utica-Rome
92.7
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, LA and Utica-Rome, NY are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.0 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Utica-Rome is 60.3 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington to $99,948 in Utica-Rome, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
92.7
Utica-Rome
92.7
Goods
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
93.7
Utica-Rome
99.7
Services
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
71.7
Utica-Rome
131.9
Rents
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
85.4
Utica-Rome
66.1

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington would need to be in Utica-Rome for the same purchasing power:

In Slidell-Mandeville-Covington In Utica-Rome Difference
$50,000 $49,974 $-26
$75,000 $74,961 $-39
$100,000 $99,948 $-52
$150,000 $149,922 $-78
$ in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington = in Utica-Rome

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.7 → 92.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Utica-Rome more expensive than Slidell-Mandeville-Covington?

Utica-Rome is 0.1% less expensive than Slidell-Mandeville-Covington. The overall cost index is 92.7 vs 92.7 (national average = 100).

What salary in Utica-Rome equals $100K in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington?

A $100,000 salary in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington has the same purchasing power as $99,948 in Utica-Rome. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Slidell-Mandeville-Covington and Utica-Rome?

Rents in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington are indexed at 85.4 while Utica-Rome is at 66.1 (national average = 100). Slidell-Mandeville-Covington has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.