Slidell-Mandeville-Covington vs Yuma

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Yuma is 0% less expensive than Slidell-Mandeville-Covington.

0% less expensive

Yuma, AZ is 0% less expensive than Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, LA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.7 vs 92.7). A $100,000 salary in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington buys about the same as $99,978 in Yuma; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 92.7 (Slidell-Mandeville-Covington) vs 92.7 (Yuma)
  • $100k in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington ≈ $99,978 purchasing power in Yuma
  • Services drives the gap (+16.2 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair LA:AZ 92.7→92.7

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE LA × AZ
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
92.7
Cost Index
Yuma
92.7
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, LA and Yuma, AZ are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.0 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Yuma is 16.2 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington to $99,978 in Yuma, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
92.7
Yuma
92.7
Goods
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
93.7
Yuma
96.2
Services
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
71.7
Yuma
87.8
Rents
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
85.4
Yuma
73.8

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington would need to be in Yuma for the same purchasing power:

In Slidell-Mandeville-Covington In Yuma Difference
$50,000 $49,989 $-11
$75,000 $74,984 $-16
$100,000 $99,978 $-22
$150,000 $149,968 $-32
$ in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington = in Yuma

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.7 → 92.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Yuma more expensive than Slidell-Mandeville-Covington?

Yuma is 0% less expensive than Slidell-Mandeville-Covington. The overall cost index is 92.7 vs 92.7 (national average = 100).

What salary in Yuma equals $100K in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington?

A $100,000 salary in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington has the same purchasing power as $99,978 in Yuma. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Slidell-Mandeville-Covington and Yuma?

Rents in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington are indexed at 85.4 while Yuma is at 73.8 (national average = 100). Slidell-Mandeville-Covington has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.