Utica-Rome vs Slidell-Mandeville-Covington

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Slidell-Mandeville-Covington is 0.1% more expensive than Utica-Rome.

0.1% more expensive

Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, LA is 0.1% more expensive than Utica-Rome, NY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.7 vs 92.7). A $100,000 salary in Utica-Rome buys about the same as $100,052 in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 92.7 (Utica-Rome) vs 92.7 (Slidell-Mandeville-Covington)
  • $100k in Utica-Rome ≈ $100,052 purchasing power in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
  • Services drives the gap (-60.3 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair NY:LA 92.7→92.7

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE NY × LA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Utica-Rome
92.7
Cost Index
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
92.7
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Utica-Rome, NY and Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, LA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.0 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Slidell-Mandeville-Covington is 60.3 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Utica-Rome to $100,052 in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Utica-Rome
92.7
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
92.7
Goods
Utica-Rome
99.7
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
93.7
Services
Utica-Rome
131.9
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
71.7
Rents
Utica-Rome
66.1
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
85.4

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Utica-Rome would need to be in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington for the same purchasing power:

In Utica-Rome In Slidell-Mandeville-Covington Difference
$50,000 $50,026 +$26
$75,000 $75,039 +$39
$100,000 $100,052 +$52
$150,000 $150,078 +$78
$ in Utica-Rome = in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.7 → 92.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Slidell-Mandeville-Covington more expensive than Utica-Rome?

Slidell-Mandeville-Covington is 0.1% more expensive than Utica-Rome. The overall cost index is 92.7 vs 92.7 (national average = 100).

What salary in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington equals $100K in Utica-Rome?

A $100,000 salary in Utica-Rome has the same purchasing power as $100,052 in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Utica-Rome and Slidell-Mandeville-Covington?

Rents in Utica-Rome are indexed at 66.1 while Slidell-Mandeville-Covington is at 85.4 (national average = 100). Slidell-Mandeville-Covington has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.