Overall
- Salem
- 103.6
Diff +10.9 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Salem is 11.8% more expensive than Slidell-Mandeville-Covington.
Salem, OR is 11.8% more expensive than Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, LA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.6 vs 92.7). A $100,000 salary in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington buys about the same as $111,780 in Salem; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair LA:OR 92.7→103.6
TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, LA and Salem, OR sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 10.9 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Salem is above 100 while Slidell-Mandeville-Covington is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Services leads the difference, with Salem 33.0 points higher than Slidell-Mandeville-Covington. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington to $111,780 in Salem, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington and Salem share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 2.6 to 10.9 RPP points. Salem remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 34.8 points between the first and latest shared releases (9.9 to 24.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Slidell-Mandeville-Covington RPP | Salem RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 96.7 | 94.1 | 2.6 points Slidell-Mandeville-Covington higher |
| 2012 | 97.6 | 101.1 | 3.4 points Salem higher |
| 2016 | 98.7 | 97.1 | 1.6 points Slidell-Mandeville-Covington higher |
| 2020 | 95.7 | 100.9 | 5.3 points Salem higher |
| 2024 | 92.7 | 103.6 | 10.9 points Salem higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Diff +10.9 RPP
Diff +11.6 RPP
Diff +33.0 RPP
Diff +24.9 RPP
| Category | Slidell-Mandeville-Covington | Salem | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 92.7 | 103.6 | +10.9 |
| Goods | 93.7 | 105.3 | +11.6 |
| Services | 71.7 | 104.7 | +33.0 |
| Rents | 85.4 | 110.3 | +24.9 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington would need to be in Salem for the same purchasing power:
| In Slidell-Mandeville-Covington | In Salem | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $55,890 | +$5,890 |
| $75,000 | $83,835 | +$8,835 |
| $100,000 | $111,780 | +$11,780 |
| $150,000 | $167,670 | +$17,670 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.7 → 103.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Salem is 11.8% more expensive than Slidell-Mandeville-Covington. The overall cost index is 103.6 vs 92.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington has the same purchasing power as $111,780 in Salem. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington are indexed at 85.4 while Salem is at 110.3 (national average = 100). Salem has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.