Overall
- Salem
- 103.6
Diff -10.9 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Slidell-Mandeville-Covington is 10.5% less expensive than Salem.
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, LA is 10.5% less expensive than Salem, OR on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.7 vs 103.6). A $100,000 salary in Salem buys about the same as $89,462 in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair OR:LA 103.6→92.7
TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Salem, OR and Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, LA sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 10.9 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Salem is above 100 while Slidell-Mandeville-Covington is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Services leads the difference, with Slidell-Mandeville-Covington 33.0 points lower than Salem. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Salem to $89,462 in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Salem and Slidell-Mandeville-Covington share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 2.6 to 10.9 RPP points. Salem remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 34.8 points between the first and latest shared releases (9.9 to 24.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Salem RPP | Slidell-Mandeville-Covington RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 94.1 | 96.7 | 2.6 points Slidell-Mandeville-Covington higher |
| 2012 | 101.1 | 97.6 | 3.4 points Salem higher |
| 2016 | 97.1 | 98.7 | 1.6 points Slidell-Mandeville-Covington higher |
| 2020 | 100.9 | 95.7 | 5.3 points Salem higher |
| 2024 | 103.6 | 92.7 | 10.9 points Salem higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Diff -10.9 RPP
Diff -11.6 RPP
Diff -33.0 RPP
Diff -24.9 RPP
| Category | Salem | Slidell-Mandeville-Covington | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.6 | 92.7 | -10.9 |
| Goods | 105.3 | 93.7 | -11.6 |
| Services | 104.7 | 71.7 | -33.0 |
| Rents | 110.3 | 85.4 | -24.9 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Salem would need to be in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington for the same purchasing power:
| In Salem | In Slidell-Mandeville-Covington | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $44,731 | $-5,269 |
| $75,000 | $67,096 | $-7,904 |
| $100,000 | $89,462 | $-10,538 |
| $150,000 | $134,192 | $-15,808 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.6 → 92.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington is 10.5% less expensive than Salem. The overall cost index is 92.7 vs 103.6 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Salem has the same purchasing power as $89,462 in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Salem are indexed at 110.3 while Slidell-Mandeville-Covington is at 85.4 (national average = 100). Salem has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.