Overall
- Sioux Falls
- 90.6
- Rochester
- 90.8
Diff +0.2 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Rochester is 0.2% more expensive than Sioux Falls.
Rochester, MN is 0.2% more expensive than Sioux Falls, SD-MN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.8 vs 90.6). A $100,000 salary in Sioux Falls buys about the same as $100,210 in Rochester; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair SD:MN 90.6→90.8
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Sioux Falls, SD-MN and Rochester, MN are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Rochester is 6.7 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Sioux Falls to $100,210 in Rochester, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff -0.0 RPP
Diff +6.7 RPP
Diff +1.0 RPP
| Category | Sioux Falls | Rochester | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 90.6 | 90.8 | +0.2 |
| Goods | 95.5 | 95.4 | -0.0 |
| Services | 80.7 | 87.4 | +6.7 |
| Rents | 77.6 | 78.6 | +1.0 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Sioux Falls would need to be in Rochester for the same purchasing power:
| In Sioux Falls | In Rochester | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,105 | +$105 |
| $75,000 | $75,157 | +$157 |
| $100,000 | $100,210 | +$210 |
| $150,000 | $150,314 | +$314 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.6 → 90.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Rochester is 0.2% more expensive than Sioux Falls. The overall cost index is 90.8 vs 90.6 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Sioux Falls has the same purchasing power as $100,210 in Rochester. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Sioux Falls are indexed at 77.6 while Rochester is at 78.6 (national average = 100). Rochester has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.