PlainCost
Home / Compare /

Sioux Falls vs Fargo

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Fargo is 0.3% more expensive than Sioux Falls.

0.3% more expensive

Fargo, ND-MN is 0.3% more expensive than Sioux Falls, SD-MN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.9 vs 90.6). A $100,000 salary in Sioux Falls buys about the same as $100,265 in Fargo; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 90.6 (Sioux Falls) vs 90.9 (Fargo)
  • $100k in Sioux Falls ≈ $100,265 purchasing power in Fargo
  • Rents drives the gap (+3.5 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair SD:ND 90.6→90.9

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE SD × ND
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Sioux Falls
90.6
Cost Index
Fargo
90.9
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Sioux Falls, SD-MN and Fargo, ND-MN are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Fargo is 3.5 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Sioux Falls corresponds to $100,265 in Fargo.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Sioux Falls
90.6
Fargo
90.9
Goods
Sioux Falls
95.5
Fargo
95.7
Services
Sioux Falls
80.7
Fargo
77.3
Rents
Sioux Falls
77.6
Fargo
81.1

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Sioux Falls would need to be in Fargo for the same purchasing power:

In Sioux Falls In Fargo Difference
$50,000 $50,132 +$132
$75,000 $75,199 +$199
$100,000 $100,265 +$265
$150,000 $150,397 +$397
$ in Sioux Falls = – in Fargo

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.6 → 90.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Reverse: Fargo → Sioux Falls Sioux Falls Details Fargo Details

Also Compare

vs Elizabethtown vs Battle Creek vs Baton Rouge vs Springfield vs Rochester vs Oklahoma City vs Saginaw vs Clarksville

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Fargo more expensive than Sioux Falls?

Fargo is 0.3% more expensive than Sioux Falls. The overall cost index is 90.9 vs 90.6 (national average = 100).

What salary in Fargo equals $100K in Sioux Falls?

A $100,000 salary in Sioux Falls has the same purchasing power as $100,265 in Fargo. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Sioux Falls and Fargo?

Rents in Sioux Falls are indexed at 77.6 while Fargo is at 81.1 (national average = 100). Fargo has higher rents.

Data sources

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.