Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura vs Boston-Cambridge-Newton

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Boston-Cambridge-Newton is 2.1% less expensive than Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura.

2.1% less expensive

Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH is 2.1% less expensive than Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 108.3 vs 110.5). A $100,000 salary in Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura buys about the same as $97,948 in Boston-Cambridge-Newton; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 110.5 (Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura) vs 108.3 (Boston-Cambridge-Newton)
  • $100k in Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura ≈ $97,948 purchasing power in Boston-Cambridge-Newton
  • Rents drives the gap (-22.7 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair CA:MA 110.5→108.3

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE CA × MA
  • RENT-LED Rent-led gap
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura would need to be in Boston-Cambridge-Newton for the same purchasing power:

In Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura In Boston-Cambridge-Newton Difference
$50,000 $48,974 $-1,026
$75,000 $73,461 $-1,539
$100,000 $97,948 $-2,052
$150,000 $146,922 $-3,078
$ in Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura = in Boston-Cambridge-Newton

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (110.5 → 108.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH is 2.1% less expensive than Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.3-point overall gap.

Rents leads the difference, with Boston-Cambridge-Newton 22.7 points lower than Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura corresponds to $97,948 in Boston-Cambridge-Newton.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura
110.5
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
108.3
Goods
Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura
105.2
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
99.7
Services
Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura
152.9
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
148.8
Rents
Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura
171.1
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
148.4

Vertical line = national average (100)

Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura
110.5
Cost Index
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
108.3
Cost Index

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Boston-Cambridge-Newton more expensive than Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura?

Boston-Cambridge-Newton is 2.1% less expensive than Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura. The overall cost index is 108.3 vs 110.5 (national average = 100).

What salary in Boston-Cambridge-Newton equals $100K in Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura?

A $100,000 salary in Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura has the same purchasing power as $97,948 in Boston-Cambridge-Newton. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura and Boston-Cambridge-Newton?

Rents in Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura are indexed at 171.1 while Boston-Cambridge-Newton is at 148.4 (national average = 100). Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.