Overall
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 103.7
Diff -5.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Prescott Valley-Prescott is 5.2% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is 5.2% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 103.7). A $100,000 salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater buys about the same as $94,777 in Prescott Valley-Prescott; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:AZ 103.7→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
What a salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater would need to be in Prescott Valley-Prescott for the same purchasing power:
| In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | In Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $47,388 | $-2,612 |
| $75,000 | $71,083 | $-3,917 |
| $100,000 | $94,777 | $-5,223 |
| $150,000 | $142,165 | $-7,835 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.7 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is 5.2% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.4-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is above 100 while Prescott Valley-Prescott is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Rents leads the difference, with Prescott Valley-Prescott 17.9 points lower than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater corresponds to $94,777 in Prescott Valley-Prescott.
Diff -5.4 RPP
Diff -8.8 RPP
Diff -0.2 RPP
Diff -17.9 RPP
| Category | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.7 | 98.3 | -5.4 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 96.2 | -8.8 |
| Services | 91.7 | 91.5 | -0.2 |
| Rents | 116.7 | 98.8 | -17.9 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Prescott Valley-Prescott is 5.2% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 103.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has the same purchasing power as $94,777 in Prescott Valley-Prescott. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater are indexed at 116.7 while Prescott Valley-Prescott is at 98.8 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.