Overall
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 103.7
- Merced
- 98.3
Diff -5.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Merced is 5.2% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater.
Merced, CA is 5.2% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 103.7). A $100,000 salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater buys about the same as $94,796 in Merced; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:CA 103.7→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -5.4 RPP
Diff +0.1 RPP
Diff +66.6 RPP
Diff -38.0 RPP
| Category | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Merced | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.7 | 98.3 | -5.4 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 105.2 | +0.1 |
| Services | 91.7 | 158.3 | +66.6 |
| Rents | 116.7 | 78.6 | -38.0 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Services creates the largest separation: Merced is 66.6 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Merced, CA is 5.2% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.4-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is above 100 while Merced is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater to $94,796 in Merced, but it is not a personal spending weight.
What a salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater would need to be in Merced for the same purchasing power:
| In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | In Merced | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $47,398 | $-2,602 |
| $75,000 | $71,097 | $-3,903 |
| $100,000 | $94,796 | $-5,204 |
| $150,000 | $142,194 | $-7,806 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.7 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Merced is 5.2% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 103.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has the same purchasing power as $94,796 in Merced. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater are indexed at 116.7 while Merced is at 78.6 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.