Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater vs Lancaster

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lancaster is 5.2% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater.

5.2% less expensive

Lancaster, PA is 5.2% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 103.7). A $100,000 salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater buys about the same as $94,779 in Lancaster; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 103.7 (Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater) vs 98.3 (Lancaster)
  • $100k in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater ≈ $94,779 purchasing power in Lancaster
  • Rents drives the gap (-22.9 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair WA:PA 103.7→98.3

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE WA × PA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Lancaster
98.3
Goods
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
105.0
Lancaster
100.7
Services
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
91.7
Lancaster
107.3
Rents
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
116.7
Lancaster
93.8

Vertical line = national average (100)

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Rents creates the largest separation: Lancaster is 22.9 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Lancaster, PA is 5.2% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.4-point overall gap.

This route crosses the national benchmark: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is above 100 while Lancaster is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater corresponds to $94,779 in Lancaster.

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Cost Index
Lancaster
98.3
Cost Index

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater would need to be in Lancaster for the same purchasing power:

In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater In Lancaster Difference
$50,000 $47,389 $-2,611
$75,000 $71,084 $-3,916
$100,000 $94,779 $-5,221
$150,000 $142,168 $-7,832
$ in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater = in Lancaster

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.7 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Lancaster more expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?

Lancaster is 5.2% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 103.7 (national average = 100).

What salary in Lancaster equals $100K in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?

A $100,000 salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has the same purchasing power as $94,779 in Lancaster. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater and Lancaster?

Rents in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater are indexed at 116.7 while Lancaster is at 93.8 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.