Prescott Valley-Prescott vs Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 5.5% more expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott.

5.5% more expensive

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 5.5% more expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.7 vs 98.3). A $100,000 salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott buys about the same as $105,511 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 98.3 (Prescott Valley-Prescott) vs 103.7 (Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater)
  • $100k in Prescott Valley-Prescott ≈ $105,511 purchasing power in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
  • Rents drives the gap (+17.9 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair AZ:WA 98.3→103.7

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE AZ × WA
  • RENT-LED Rent-led gap
  • BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott would need to be in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater for the same purchasing power:

In Prescott Valley-Prescott In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater Difference
$50,000 $52,756 +$2,756
$75,000 $79,133 +$4,133
$100,000 $105,511 +$5,511
$150,000 $158,267 +$8,267
$ in Prescott Valley-Prescott = in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.3 → 103.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 5.5% more expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.4-point overall gap.

This route crosses the national benchmark: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is above 100 while Prescott Valley-Prescott is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.

Rents leads the difference, with Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 17.9 points higher than Prescott Valley-Prescott. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Prescott Valley-Prescott corresponds to $105,511 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Prescott Valley-Prescott
98.3
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Goods
Prescott Valley-Prescott
96.2
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
105.0
Services
Prescott Valley-Prescott
91.5
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
91.7
Rents
Prescott Valley-Prescott
98.8
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
116.7

Vertical line = national average (100)

Prescott Valley-Prescott
98.3
Cost Index
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Cost Index

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater more expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott?

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 5.5% more expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott. The overall cost index is 103.7 vs 98.3 (national average = 100).

What salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater equals $100K in Prescott Valley-Prescott?

A $100,000 salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott has the same purchasing power as $105,511 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Prescott Valley-Prescott and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?

Rents in Prescott Valley-Prescott are indexed at 98.8 while Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is at 116.7 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.