Overall
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 103.7
Diff +5.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 5.5% more expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott.
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 5.5% more expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.7 vs 98.3). A $100,000 salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott buys about the same as $105,511 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair AZ:WA 98.3→103.7
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
What a salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott would need to be in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater for the same purchasing power:
| In Prescott Valley-Prescott | In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $52,756 | +$2,756 |
| $75,000 | $79,133 | +$4,133 |
| $100,000 | $105,511 | +$5,511 |
| $150,000 | $158,267 | +$8,267 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.3 → 103.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 5.5% more expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.4-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is above 100 while Prescott Valley-Prescott is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Rents leads the difference, with Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 17.9 points higher than Prescott Valley-Prescott. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Prescott Valley-Prescott corresponds to $105,511 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater.
Diff +5.4 RPP
Diff +8.8 RPP
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff +17.9 RPP
| Category | Prescott Valley-Prescott | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.3 | 103.7 | +5.4 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 105.0 | +8.8 |
| Services | 91.5 | 91.7 | +0.2 |
| Rents | 98.8 | 116.7 | +17.9 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 5.5% more expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott. The overall cost index is 103.7 vs 98.3 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott has the same purchasing power as $105,511 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Prescott Valley-Prescott are indexed at 98.8 while Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is at 116.7 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.