Overall
- Naples-Marco Island
- 103.2
Diff +3.5 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom is 3.4% more expensive than Naples-Marco Island.
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA is 3.4% more expensive than Naples-Marco Island, FL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 106.7 vs 103.2). A $100,000 salary in Naples-Marco Island buys about the same as $103,362 in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair FL:CA 103.2→106.7
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA is 3.4% more expensive than Naples-Marco Island, FL, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 3.5-point overall gap.
Services leads the difference, with Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom 63.5 points higher than Naples-Marco Island. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Naples-Marco Island to $103,362 in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Naples-Marco Island and Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 3.0 to 3.5 RPP points. Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 60.6 points between the first and latest shared releases (3.0 to 63.5 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Naples-Marco Island RPP | Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 104.3 | 101.3 | 3.0 points Naples-Marco Island higher |
| 2012 | 101.6 | 104.9 | 3.2 points Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom higher |
| 2016 | 103.8 | 101.1 | 2.7 points Naples-Marco Island higher |
| 2020 | 99.1 | 107.0 | 7.9 points Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom higher |
| 2024 | 103.2 | 106.7 | 3.5 points Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Diff +3.5 RPP
Diff +8.9 RPP
Diff +63.5 RPP
Diff +0.8 RPP
| Category | Naples-Marco Island | Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.2 | 106.7 | +3.5 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 105.2 | +8.9 |
| Services | 87.8 | 151.3 | +63.5 |
| Rents | 129.4 | 130.2 | +0.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Naples-Marco Island would need to be in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom for the same purchasing power:
| In Naples-Marco Island | In Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $51,681 | +$1,681 |
| $75,000 | $77,522 | +$2,522 |
| $100,000 | $103,362 | +$3,362 |
| $150,000 | $155,044 | +$5,044 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.2 → 106.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom is 3.4% more expensive than Naples-Marco Island. The overall cost index is 106.7 vs 103.2 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Naples-Marco Island has the same purchasing power as $103,362 in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Naples-Marco Island are indexed at 129.4 while Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom is at 130.2 (national average = 100). Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.