Overall
- Naples-Marco Island
- 103.2
Diff -2.8 RPP
Naples-Marco Island vs Norwich-New London-Willimantic
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Norwich-New London-Willimantic is 2.7% less expensive than Naples-Marco Island.
2.7% less expensive
Norwich-New London-Willimantic, CT is 2.7% less expensive than Naples-Marco Island, FL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 100.4 vs 103.2). A $100,000 salary in Naples-Marco Island buys about the same as $97,330 in Norwich-New London-Willimantic; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 103.2 (Naples-Marco Island) vs 100.4 (Norwich-New London-Willimantic)
- $100k in Naples-Marco Island ≈ $97,330 purchasing power in Norwich-New London-Willimantic
- Services drives the gap (+60.8 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair FL:CT 103.2→100.4
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-NEAR Near tier
- CROSS-STATE FL × CT
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Naples-Marco Island
- 96.2
Diff +1.1 RPP
Services
- Naples-Marco Island
- 87.8
Diff +60.8 RPP
Rents
- Naples-Marco Island
- 129.4
Diff -35.8 RPP
| Category | Naples-Marco Island | Norwich-New London-Willimantic | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.2 | 100.4 | -2.8 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 97.3 | +1.1 |
| Services | 87.8 | 148.6 | +60.8 |
| Rents | 129.4 | 93.7 | -35.8 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Naples-Marco Island 103.2
Norwich-New London-Willimantic 100.4
Goods
Naples-Marco Island 96.2
Norwich-New London-Willimantic 97.3
Services
Naples-Marco Island 87.8
Norwich-New London-Willimantic 148.6
Rents
Naples-Marco Island 129.4
Norwich-New London-Willimantic 93.7
Vertical line = national average (100)
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Services creates the largest separation: Norwich-New London-Willimantic is 60.8 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Norwich-New London-Willimantic, CT is 2.7% less expensive than Naples-Marco Island, FL, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.8-point overall gap.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Naples-Marco Island to $97,330 in Norwich-New London-Willimantic, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Naples-Marco Island
103.2
Cost Index
Norwich-New London-Willimantic
100.4
Cost Index
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Naples-Marco Island would need to be in Norwich-New London-Willimantic for the same purchasing power:
| In Naples-Marco Island | In Norwich-New London-Willimantic | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $48,665 | $-1,335 |
| $75,000 | $72,998 | $-2,002 |
| $100,000 | $97,330 | $-2,670 |
| $150,000 | $145,996 | $-4,004 |
$ in Naples-Marco Island = in Norwich-New London-Willimantic
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.2 → 100.4), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
How the Price Gap Changed
Naples-Marco Island and Norwich-New London-Willimantic share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 0.6 to 2.8 RPP points. Naples-Marco Island remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 16.3 points between the first and latest shared releases (19.5 to 35.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Naples-Marco Island RPP | Norwich-New London-Willimantic RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 104.3 | 103.7 | 0.6 points Naples-Marco Island higher |
| 2012 | 101.6 | 101.7 | 0.1 points Norwich-New London-Willimantic higher |
| 2016 | 103.8 | 102.6 | 1.2 points Naples-Marco Island higher |
| 2020 | 99.1 | 102.1 | 3.0 points Norwich-New London-Willimantic higher |
| 2024 | 103.2 | 100.4 | 2.8 points Naples-Marco Island higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Norwich-New London-Willimantic more expensive than Naples-Marco Island?
Norwich-New London-Willimantic is 2.7% less expensive than Naples-Marco Island. The overall cost index is 100.4 vs 103.2 (national average = 100).
What salary in Norwich-New London-Willimantic equals $100K in Naples-Marco Island?
A $100,000 salary in Naples-Marco Island has the same purchasing power as $97,330 in Norwich-New London-Willimantic. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Naples-Marco Island and Norwich-New London-Willimantic?
Rents in Naples-Marco Island are indexed at 129.4 while Norwich-New London-Willimantic is at 93.7 (national average = 100). Naples-Marco Island has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.