Overall
- Logan
- 95.9
Diff -0.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood is 0.4% less expensive than Logan.
Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI is 0.4% less expensive than Logan, UT-ID on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.5 vs 95.9). A $100,000 salary in Logan buys about the same as $99,603 in Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair UT:MI 95.9→95.5
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Logan, UT-ID and Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood is 15.9 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Logan to $99,603 in Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff -0.4 RPP
Diff -2.7 RPP
Diff +15.9 RPP
Diff -4.4 RPP
| Category | Logan | Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.9 | 95.5 | -0.4 |
| Goods | 96.4 | 93.7 | -2.7 |
| Services | 77.9 | 93.8 | +15.9 |
| Rents | 91.0 | 86.6 | -4.4 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Logan and Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 0.2 to 0.4 RPP points. Logan remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 17.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (13.3 to 4.4 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Logan RPP | Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 95.8 | 95.6 | 0.2 points Logan higher |
| 2012 | 92.5 | 94.7 | 2.2 points Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood higher |
| 2016 | 94.7 | 94.2 | 0.5 points Logan higher |
| 2020 | 91.3 | 94.3 | 3.0 points Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood higher |
| 2024 | 95.9 | 95.5 | 0.4 points Logan higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Logan would need to be in Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood for the same purchasing power:
| In Logan | In Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,801 | $-199 |
| $75,000 | $74,702 | $-298 |
| $100,000 | $99,603 | $-397 |
| $150,000 | $149,404 | $-596 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.9 → 95.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood is 0.4% less expensive than Logan. The overall cost index is 95.5 vs 95.9 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Logan has the same purchasing power as $99,603 in Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Logan are indexed at 91.0 while Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood is at 86.6 (national average = 100). Logan has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.