Overall
Diff -0.4 RPP
Logan vs Yakima
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Yakima is 0.4% less expensive than Logan.
0.4% less expensive
Yakima, WA is 0.4% less expensive than Logan, UT-ID on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.5 vs 95.9). A $100,000 salary in Logan buys about the same as $99,602 in Yakima; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 95.9 (Logan) vs 95.5 (Yakima)
- $100k in Logan ≈ $99,602 purchasing power in Yakima
- Rents drives the gap (-18.3 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair UT:WA 95.9→95.5
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE UT × WA
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Logan
95.9
Cost Index
Yakima
95.5
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Logan, UT-ID and Yakima, WA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Yakima is 18.3 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Logan corresponds to $99,602 in Yakima.
Category Breakdown
Goods
Diff +8.6 RPP
Services
Diff +14.0 RPP
Rents
Diff -18.3 RPP
| Category | Logan | Yakima | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.9 | 95.5 | -0.4 |
| Goods | 96.4 | 105.0 | +8.6 |
| Services | 77.9 | 91.9 | +14.0 |
| Rents | 91.0 | 72.6 | -18.3 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Logan 95.9
Yakima 95.5
Goods
Logan 96.4
Yakima 105.0
Services
Logan 77.9
Yakima 91.9
Rents
Logan 91.0
Yakima 72.6
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Logan would need to be in Yakima for the same purchasing power:
| In Logan | In Yakima | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,801 | $-199 |
| $75,000 | $74,701 | $-299 |
| $100,000 | $99,602 | $-398 |
| $150,000 | $149,403 | $-597 |
$ in Logan = in Yakima
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.9 → 95.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Yakima more expensive than Logan?
Yakima is 0.4% less expensive than Logan. The overall cost index is 95.5 vs 95.9 (national average = 100).
What salary in Yakima equals $100K in Logan?
A $100,000 salary in Logan has the same purchasing power as $99,602 in Yakima. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Logan and Yakima?
Rents in Logan are indexed at 91.0 while Yakima is at 72.6 (national average = 100). Logan has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.