Overall
- Logan
- 95.9
- Buffalo-Cheektowaga
- 95.8
Diff -0.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Buffalo-Cheektowaga is 0.1% less expensive than Logan.
Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY is 0.1% less expensive than Logan, UT-ID on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.8 vs 95.9). A $100,000 salary in Logan buys about the same as $99,913 in Buffalo-Cheektowaga; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair UT:NY 95.9→95.8
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Logan, UT-ID and Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Buffalo-Cheektowaga is 51.6 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Logan to $99,913 in Buffalo-Cheektowaga, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff -0.1 RPP
Diff +3.3 RPP
Diff +51.6 RPP
Diff -10.0 RPP
| Category | Logan | Buffalo-Cheektowaga | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.9 | 95.8 | -0.1 |
| Goods | 96.4 | 99.7 | +3.3 |
| Services | 77.9 | 129.5 | +51.6 |
| Rents | 91.0 | 81.0 | -10.0 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Logan would need to be in Buffalo-Cheektowaga for the same purchasing power:
| In Logan | In Buffalo-Cheektowaga | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,957 | $-43 |
| $75,000 | $74,935 | $-65 |
| $100,000 | $99,913 | $-87 |
| $150,000 | $149,870 | $-130 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.9 → 95.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Buffalo-Cheektowaga is 0.1% less expensive than Logan. The overall cost index is 95.8 vs 95.9 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Logan has the same purchasing power as $99,913 in Buffalo-Cheektowaga. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Logan are indexed at 91.0 while Buffalo-Cheektowaga is at 81.0 (national average = 100). Logan has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.