Overall
- Bellingham
- 103.3
- Lancaster
- 98.3
Diff -5.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lancaster is 4.9% less expensive than Bellingham.
Lancaster, PA is 4.9% less expensive than Bellingham, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 103.3). A $100,000 salary in Bellingham buys about the same as $95,087 in Lancaster; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:PA 103.3→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -5.1 RPP
Diff -4.3 RPP
Diff +7.4 RPP
Diff -19.1 RPP
| Category | Bellingham | Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.3 | 98.3 | -5.1 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 100.7 | -4.3 |
| Services | 99.9 | 107.3 | +7.4 |
| Rents | 112.9 | 93.8 | -19.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Lancaster is 19.1 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Lancaster, PA is 4.9% less expensive than Bellingham, WA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.1-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Bellingham is above 100 while Lancaster is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Bellingham corresponds to $95,087 in Lancaster.
What a salary in Bellingham would need to be in Lancaster for the same purchasing power:
| In Bellingham | In Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $47,543 | $-2,457 |
| $75,000 | $71,315 | $-3,685 |
| $100,000 | $95,087 | $-4,913 |
| $150,000 | $142,630 | $-7,370 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.3 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Lancaster is 4.9% less expensive than Bellingham. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 103.3 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Bellingham has the same purchasing power as $95,087 in Lancaster. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Bellingham are indexed at 112.9 while Lancaster is at 93.8 (national average = 100). Bellingham has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.