Overall
- Lancaster
- 98.3
- Bellingham
- 103.3
Diff +5.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Bellingham is 5.2% more expensive than Lancaster.
Bellingham, WA is 5.2% more expensive than Lancaster, PA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.3 vs 98.3). A $100,000 salary in Lancaster buys about the same as $105,167 in Bellingham; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair PA:WA 98.3→103.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff +5.1 RPP
Diff +4.3 RPP
Diff -7.4 RPP
Diff +19.1 RPP
| Category | Lancaster | Bellingham | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.3 | 103.3 | +5.1 |
| Goods | 100.7 | 105.0 | +4.3 |
| Services | 107.3 | 99.9 | -7.4 |
| Rents | 93.8 | 112.9 | +19.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Bellingham is 19.1 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Bellingham, WA is 5.2% more expensive than Lancaster, PA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.1-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Bellingham is above 100 while Lancaster is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Lancaster corresponds to $105,167 in Bellingham.
What a salary in Lancaster would need to be in Bellingham for the same purchasing power:
| In Lancaster | In Bellingham | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $52,584 | +$2,584 |
| $75,000 | $78,875 | +$3,875 |
| $100,000 | $105,167 | +$5,167 |
| $150,000 | $157,751 | +$7,751 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.3 → 103.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Bellingham is 5.2% more expensive than Lancaster. The overall cost index is 103.3 vs 98.3 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Lancaster has the same purchasing power as $105,167 in Bellingham. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Lancaster are indexed at 93.8 while Bellingham is at 112.9 (national average = 100). Bellingham has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.