PlainCost
Home / Compare /

Abilene vs Sioux Falls

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Sioux Falls is 0.3% more expensive than Abilene.

0.3% more expensive

Sioux Falls, SD-MN is 0.3% more expensive than Abilene, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.6 vs 90.4). A $100,000 salary in Abilene buys about the same as $100,295 in Sioux Falls; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 90.4 (Abilene) vs 90.6 (Sioux Falls)
  • $100k in Abilene ≈ $100,295 purchasing power in Sioux Falls
  • Rents drives the gap (+3.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair TX:SD 90.4→90.6

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE TX × SD
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Abilene
90.4
Cost Index
Sioux Falls
90.6
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Abilene, TX and Sioux Falls, SD-MN are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Sioux Falls is 3.8 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Abilene corresponds to $100,295 in Sioux Falls.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Abilene
90.4
Sioux Falls
90.6
Goods
Abilene
93.8
Sioux Falls
95.5
Services
Abilene
81.2
Sioux Falls
80.7
Rents
Abilene
73.8
Sioux Falls
77.6

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Abilene would need to be in Sioux Falls for the same purchasing power:

In Abilene In Sioux Falls Difference
$50,000 $50,148 +$148
$75,000 $75,222 +$222
$100,000 $100,295 +$295
$150,000 $150,443 +$443
$ in Abilene = – in Sioux Falls

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.4 → 90.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Reverse: Sioux Falls → Abilene Abilene Details Sioux Falls Details

Also Compare

vs Elkhart-Goshen vs Oklahoma City vs Springfield vs Lawrence vs Las Cruces vs Battle Creek vs Elizabethtown vs Baton Rouge

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Sioux Falls more expensive than Abilene?

Sioux Falls is 0.3% more expensive than Abilene. The overall cost index is 90.6 vs 90.4 (national average = 100).

What salary in Sioux Falls equals $100K in Abilene?

A $100,000 salary in Abilene has the same purchasing power as $100,295 in Sioux Falls. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Abilene and Sioux Falls?

Rents in Abilene are indexed at 73.8 while Sioux Falls is at 77.6 (national average = 100). Sioux Falls has higher rents.

Data sources

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.