Overall
Diff -0.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lawrence is 0.1% less expensive than Abilene.
Lawrence, KS is 0.1% less expensive than Abilene, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.2 vs 90.4). A $100,000 salary in Abilene buys about the same as $99,866 in Lawrence; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair TX:KS 90.4→90.2
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Abilene, TX and Lawrence, KS are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Lawrence is 8.1 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Abilene to $99,866 in Lawrence, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff -0.1 RPP
Diff +0.3 RPP
Diff +8.1 RPP
Diff -2.2 RPP
| Category | Abilene | Lawrence | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 90.4 | 90.2 | -0.1 |
| Goods | 93.8 | 94.0 | +0.3 |
| Services | 81.2 | 89.3 | +8.1 |
| Rents | 73.8 | 71.6 | -2.2 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Abilene and Lawrence share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 6.0 to 0.1 RPP points. Abilene remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 24.8 points between the first and latest shared releases (22.7 to 2.2 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Abilene RPP | Lawrence RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 92.2 | 98.2 | 6.0 points Lawrence higher |
| 2012 | 94.1 | 96.0 | 1.9 points Lawrence higher |
| 2016 | 93.3 | 94.1 | 0.8 points Lawrence higher |
| 2020 | 90.3 | 94.0 | 3.7 points Lawrence higher |
| 2024 | 90.4 | 90.2 | 0.1 points Abilene higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Abilene would need to be in Lawrence for the same purchasing power:
| In Abilene | In Lawrence | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,933 | $-67 |
| $75,000 | $74,900 | $-100 |
| $100,000 | $99,866 | $-134 |
| $150,000 | $149,799 | $-201 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.4 → 90.2), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Lawrence is 0.1% less expensive than Abilene. The overall cost index is 90.2 vs 90.4 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Abilene has the same purchasing power as $99,866 in Lawrence. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Abilene are indexed at 73.8 while Lawrence is at 71.6 (national average = 100). Abilene has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.