Worcester vs Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington is 0% more expensive than Worcester.

0% more expensive

Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD is 0% more expensive than Worcester, MA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 102.6 vs 102.5). A $100,000 salary in Worcester buys about the same as $100,030 in Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 102.5 (Worcester) vs 102.6 (Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington)
  • $100k in Worcester ≈ $100,030 purchasing power in Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington
  • Services drives the gap (-40.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair MA:PA 102.5→102.6

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE MA × PA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Worcester
102.5
Cost Index
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington
102.6
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Worcester, MA and Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.0 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington is 40.8 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Worcester to $100,030 in Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Worcester
102.5
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington
102.6
Goods
Worcester
97.0
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington
96.8
Services
Worcester
155.2
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington
114.4
Rents
Worcester
113.0
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington
113.1

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Worcester would need to be in Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington for the same purchasing power:

In Worcester In Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington Difference
$50,000 $50,015 +$15
$75,000 $75,023 +$23
$100,000 $100,030 +$30
$150,000 $150,045 +$45
$ in Worcester = in Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (102.5 → 102.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington more expensive than Worcester?

Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington is 0% more expensive than Worcester. The overall cost index is 102.6 vs 102.5 (national average = 100).

What salary in Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington equals $100K in Worcester?

A $100,000 salary in Worcester has the same purchasing power as $100,030 in Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Worcester and Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington?

Rents in Worcester are indexed at 113.0 while Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington is at 113.1 (national average = 100). Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.