Overall
- Worcester
- 102.5
- Mount Vernon-Anacortes
- 102.4
Diff -0.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Mount Vernon-Anacortes is 0.1% less expensive than Worcester.
Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA is 0.1% less expensive than Worcester, MA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 102.4 vs 102.5). A $100,000 salary in Worcester buys about the same as $99,922 in Mount Vernon-Anacortes; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair MA:WA 102.5→102.4
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Worcester, MA and Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Mount Vernon-Anacortes is 59.2 points lower. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Worcester to $99,922 in Mount Vernon-Anacortes, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff -0.1 RPP
Diff +8.0 RPP
Diff -59.2 RPP
Diff -4.8 RPP
| Category | Worcester | Mount Vernon-Anacortes | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 102.5 | 102.4 | -0.1 |
| Goods | 97.0 | 105.0 | +8.0 |
| Services | 155.2 | 96.0 | -59.2 |
| Rents | 113.0 | 108.2 | -4.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Worcester and Mount Vernon-Anacortes share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 1.8 to 0.1 RPP points. Worcester remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 23.5 points between the first and latest shared releases (82.7 to 59.2 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Worcester RPP | Mount Vernon-Anacortes RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 104.7 | 102.9 | 1.8 points Worcester higher |
| 2012 | 103.0 | 98.7 | 4.3 points Worcester higher |
| 2016 | 106.3 | 101.4 | 4.8 points Worcester higher |
| 2020 | 101.8 | 102.1 | 0.3 points Mount Vernon-Anacortes higher |
| 2024 | 102.5 | 102.4 | 0.1 points Worcester higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Worcester would need to be in Mount Vernon-Anacortes for the same purchasing power:
| In Worcester | In Mount Vernon-Anacortes | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,961 | $-39 |
| $75,000 | $74,941 | $-59 |
| $100,000 | $99,922 | $-78 |
| $150,000 | $149,883 | $-117 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (102.5 → 102.4), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Mount Vernon-Anacortes is 0.1% less expensive than Worcester. The overall cost index is 102.4 vs 102.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Worcester has the same purchasing power as $99,922 in Mount Vernon-Anacortes. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Worcester are indexed at 113.0 while Mount Vernon-Anacortes is at 108.2 (national average = 100). Worcester has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.