Wichita Falls vs Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

The Bureau of Economic Analysis indexes Wichita Falls, TX at an overall Regional Price Parity of 89.5 and Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX at 98.6, using the U.S. national average of 100 as the reference point. That puts Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands 10.2% more expensive than Wichita Falls on a blended basket of goods, services, and rents. The raw index gap of 9.1 points matters more than the headline comparison because it flows directly into salary-equivalent math that families use for relocation, job offers, and remote-work arbitrage decisions.

Inside the breakdown, Wichita Falls indexes goods at 93.8, services at 84.1, and rents at 68.2, while Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands comes in at 100.6, 95.3, and 104.5 on the same three categories. The rent line carries the largest weight in the BEA methodology, so a metro with a higher rent index almost always ends up more expensive overall - Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands carries the heavier rent load here, and that tends to dominate household budget experience on the ground.

In salary terms, a $100,000 income in Wichita Falls has the same purchasing power as $110,184 in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands based on these indexes. The two metros serve populations of roughly 148,978 (Wichita Falls) and 7,274,714 (Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands), and median household incomes are $63,618 versus $80,458 respectively - so the right way to read this comparison is never the index alone, but the ratio of your expected local salary to the rent and services mix. For any serious relocation or remote-work decision, pair this BEA comparison with BLS occupation-specific wage data, HUD Fair Market Rent tables, and state tax treatment before committing.