Overall
- Wichita Falls
- 89.5
Diff -9.1 RPP
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands vs Wichita Falls
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Wichita Falls is 9.2% less expensive than Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands.
9.2% less expensive
Wichita Falls, TX is 9.2% less expensive than Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 89.5 vs 98.6). A $100,000 salary in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands buys about the same as $90,757 in Wichita Falls; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 98.6 (Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands) vs 89.5 (Wichita Falls)
- $100k in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands ≈ $90,757 purchasing power in Wichita Falls
- Rents drives the gap (-36.3 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair TX:TX 98.6→89.5
TIER-GAP · SAME-STATE · RENT-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
- SAME-STATE Same state · TX
- RENT-LED Rent-led gap
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands would need to be in Wichita Falls for the same purchasing power:
| In Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands | In Wichita Falls | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $45,379 | $-4,621 |
| $75,000 | $68,068 | $-6,932 |
| $100,000 | $90,757 | $-9,243 |
| $150,000 | $136,136 | $-13,864 |
$ in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands = in Wichita Falls
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.6 → 89.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX and Wichita Falls, TX sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 9.1 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
Rents leads the difference, with Wichita Falls 36.3 points lower than Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands corresponds to $90,757 in Wichita Falls.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Wichita Falls
- 93.8
Diff -6.9 RPP
Services
- Wichita Falls
- 84.1
Diff -11.2 RPP
Rents
- Wichita Falls
- 68.2
Diff -36.3 RPP
| Category | Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands | Wichita Falls | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.6 | 89.5 | -9.1 |
| Goods | 100.6 | 93.8 | -6.9 |
| Services | 95.3 | 84.1 | -11.2 |
| Rents | 104.5 | 68.2 | -36.3 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands 98.6
Wichita Falls 89.5
Goods
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands 100.6
Wichita Falls 93.8
Services
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands 95.3
Wichita Falls 84.1
Rents
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands 104.5
Wichita Falls 68.2
Vertical line = national average (100)
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
98.6
Cost Index
Wichita Falls
89.5
Cost Index
How the Price Gap Changed
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands and Wichita Falls share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 5.9 to 9.1 RPP points. Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 11.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (24.6 to 36.3 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands RPP | Wichita Falls RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 99.4 | 93.5 | 5.9 points Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands higher |
| 2012 | 100.0 | 94.0 | 6.1 points Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands higher |
| 2016 | 102.4 | 93.0 | 9.4 points Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands higher |
| 2020 | 100.0 | 92.5 | 7.4 points Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands higher |
| 2024 | 98.6 | 89.5 | 9.1 points Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Wichita Falls more expensive than Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands?
Wichita Falls is 9.2% less expensive than Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands. The overall cost index is 89.5 vs 98.6 (national average = 100).
What salary in Wichita Falls equals $100K in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands?
A $100,000 salary in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands has the same purchasing power as $90,757 in Wichita Falls. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands and Wichita Falls?
Rents in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands are indexed at 104.5 while Wichita Falls is at 68.2 (national average = 100). Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.