Overall
- Victoria
- 89.8
- Beaumont-Port Arthur
- 90.0
Diff +0.2 RPP
Victoria vs Beaumont-Port Arthur
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Beaumont-Port Arthur is 0.2% more expensive than Victoria.
0.2% more expensive
Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX is 0.2% more expensive than Victoria, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.0 vs 89.8). A $100,000 salary in Victoria buys about the same as $100,230 in Beaumont-Port Arthur; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 89.8 (Victoria) vs 90.0 (Beaumont-Port Arthur)
- $100k in Victoria ≈ $100,230 purchasing power in Beaumont-Port Arthur
- Services drives the gap (-2.2 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair TX:TX 89.8→90.0
PHOTO-FINISH · SAME-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- SAME-STATE Same state · TX
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Victoria
89.8
Cost Index
Beaumont-Port Arthur
90.0
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Victoria, TX and Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Beaumont-Port Arthur is 2.2 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Victoria to $100,230 in Beaumont-Port Arthur, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Victoria
- 93.8
- Beaumont-Port Arthur
- 93.8
Diff 0.0 RPP
Services
- Victoria
- 85.3
- Beaumont-Port Arthur
- 83.1
Diff -2.2 RPP
Rents
- Victoria
- 69.3
- Beaumont-Port Arthur
- 70.9
Diff +1.6 RPP
| Category | Victoria | Beaumont-Port Arthur | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 89.8 | 90.0 | +0.2 |
| Goods | 93.8 | 93.8 | 0.0 |
| Services | 85.3 | 83.1 | -2.2 |
| Rents | 69.3 | 70.9 | +1.6 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Victoria 89.8
Beaumont-Port Arthur 90.0
Goods
Victoria 93.8
Beaumont-Port Arthur 93.8
Services
Victoria 85.3
Beaumont-Port Arthur 83.1
Rents
Victoria 69.3
Beaumont-Port Arthur 70.9
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Victoria would need to be in Beaumont-Port Arthur for the same purchasing power:
| In Victoria | In Beaumont-Port Arthur | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,115 | +$115 |
| $75,000 | $75,173 | +$173 |
| $100,000 | $100,230 | +$230 |
| $150,000 | $150,346 | +$346 |
$ in Victoria = in Beaumont-Port Arthur
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (89.8 → 90.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Beaumont-Port Arthur more expensive than Victoria?
Beaumont-Port Arthur is 0.2% more expensive than Victoria. The overall cost index is 90.0 vs 89.8 (national average = 100).
What salary in Beaumont-Port Arthur equals $100K in Victoria?
A $100,000 salary in Victoria has the same purchasing power as $100,230 in Beaumont-Port Arthur. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Victoria and Beaumont-Port Arthur?
Rents in Victoria are indexed at 69.3 while Beaumont-Port Arthur is at 70.9 (national average = 100). Beaumont-Port Arthur has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.