Victoria vs Kokomo

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Kokomo is 0.2% less expensive than Victoria.

0.2% less expensive

Kokomo, IN is 0.2% less expensive than Victoria, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 89.6 vs 89.8). A $100,000 salary in Victoria buys about the same as $99,787 in Kokomo; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 89.8 (Victoria) vs 89.6 (Kokomo)
  • $100k in Victoria ≈ $99,787 purchasing power in Kokomo
  • Rents drives the gap (-10.1 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair TX:IN 89.8→89.6

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE TX × IN
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Victoria
89.8
Cost Index
Kokomo
89.6
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Victoria, TX and Kokomo, IN are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Kokomo is 10.1 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Victoria corresponds to $99,787 in Kokomo.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Victoria
89.8
Kokomo
89.6
Goods
Victoria
93.8
Kokomo
94.3
Services
Victoria
85.3
Kokomo
86.3
Rents
Victoria
69.3
Kokomo
59.3

Vertical line = national average (100)

How the Price Gap Changed

Victoria and Kokomo share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 1.5 to 0.2 RPP points. Victoria remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 13.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (12.0 to 1.0 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Victoria RPP Kokomo RPP Relative Gap
2008 93.9 92.3 1.5 points Victoria higher
2012 94.6 90.7 3.9 points Victoria higher
2016 97.5 87.7 9.8 points Victoria higher
2020 95.3 88.5 6.9 points Victoria higher
2024 89.8 89.6 0.2 points Victoria higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Victoria would need to be in Kokomo for the same purchasing power:

In Victoria In Kokomo Difference
$50,000 $49,894 $-106
$75,000 $74,841 $-159
$100,000 $99,787 $-213
$150,000 $149,681 $-319
$ in Victoria = – in Kokomo

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (89.8 → 89.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Kokomo more expensive than Victoria?

Kokomo is 0.2% less expensive than Victoria. The overall cost index is 89.6 vs 89.8 (national average = 100).

What salary in Kokomo equals $100K in Victoria?

A $100,000 salary in Victoria has the same purchasing power as $99,787 in Kokomo. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Victoria and Kokomo?

Rents in Victoria are indexed at 69.3 while Kokomo is at 59.3 (national average = 100). Victoria has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.