Overall
Diff +0.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Rome is 0.4% more expensive than Victoria.
Rome, GA is 0.4% more expensive than Victoria, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.2 vs 89.8). A $100,000 salary in Victoria buys about the same as $100,358 in Rome; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair TX:GA 89.8→90.2
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Victoria, TX and Rome, GA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Rome is 9.0 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Victoria corresponds to $100,358 in Rome.
Diff +0.3 RPP
Diff +2.5 RPP
Diff +5.5 RPP
Diff -9.0 RPP
| Category | Victoria | Rome | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 89.8 | 90.2 | +0.3 |
| Goods | 93.8 | 96.3 | +2.5 |
| Services | 85.3 | 90.7 | +5.5 |
| Rents | 69.3 | 60.3 | -9.0 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Victoria and Rome share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 5.9 to 0.3 RPP points. Rome remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 21.1 points between the first and latest shared releases (15.6 to 5.5 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Victoria RPP | Rome RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 93.9 | 88.0 | 5.9 points Victoria higher |
| 2012 | 94.6 | 86.3 | 8.3 points Victoria higher |
| 2016 | 97.5 | 88.3 | 9.3 points Victoria higher |
| 2020 | 95.3 | 86.3 | 9.0 points Victoria higher |
| 2024 | 89.8 | 90.2 | 0.3 points Rome higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Victoria would need to be in Rome for the same purchasing power:
| In Victoria | In Rome | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,179 | +$179 |
| $75,000 | $75,269 | +$269 |
| $100,000 | $100,358 | +$358 |
| $150,000 | $150,538 | +$538 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (89.8 → 90.2), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Rome is 0.4% more expensive than Victoria. The overall cost index is 90.2 vs 89.8 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Victoria has the same purchasing power as $100,358 in Rome. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Victoria are indexed at 69.3 while Rome is at 60.3 (national average = 100). Victoria has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.