Overall
- Tuscaloosa
- 87.7
- Dubuque
- 87.3
Diff -0.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Dubuque is 0.4% less expensive than Tuscaloosa.
Dubuque, IA is 0.4% less expensive than Tuscaloosa, AL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 87.3 vs 87.7). A $100,000 salary in Tuscaloosa buys about the same as $99,551 in Dubuque; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair AL:IA 87.7→87.3
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Tuscaloosa, AL and Dubuque, IA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Dubuque is 5.8 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Tuscaloosa corresponds to $99,551 in Dubuque.
Diff -0.4 RPP
Diff -2.7 RPP
Diff -3.2 RPP
Diff +5.8 RPP
| Category | Tuscaloosa | Dubuque | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 87.7 | 87.3 | -0.4 |
| Goods | 96.4 | 93.7 | -2.7 |
| Services | 84.4 | 81.2 | -3.2 |
| Rents | 58.2 | 64.0 | +5.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Tuscaloosa and Dubuque share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 3.7 to 0.4 RPP points. Tuscaloosa remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Goods changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 5.9 points between the first and latest shared releases (3.2 to 2.7 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Tuscaloosa RPP | Dubuque RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 89.7 | 93.4 | 3.7 points Dubuque higher |
| 2012 | 90.6 | 91.8 | 1.2 points Dubuque higher |
| 2016 | 90.9 | 91.2 | 0.3 points Dubuque higher |
| 2020 | 87.1 | 89.8 | 2.7 points Dubuque higher |
| 2024 | 87.7 | 87.3 | 0.4 points Tuscaloosa higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Tuscaloosa would need to be in Dubuque for the same purchasing power:
| In Tuscaloosa | In Dubuque | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,775 | $-225 |
| $75,000 | $74,663 | $-337 |
| $100,000 | $99,551 | $-449 |
| $150,000 | $149,326 | $-674 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (87.7 → 87.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Dubuque is 0.4% less expensive than Tuscaloosa. The overall cost index is 87.3 vs 87.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Tuscaloosa has the same purchasing power as $99,551 in Dubuque. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Tuscaloosa are indexed at 58.2 while Dubuque is at 64.0 (national average = 100). Dubuque has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.