Overall
- Lincoln
- 91.6
Diff +0.5 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lincoln is 0.5% more expensive than Staunton-Stuarts Draft.
Lincoln, NE is 0.5% more expensive than Staunton-Stuarts Draft, VA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.6 vs 91.1). A $100,000 salary in Staunton-Stuarts Draft buys about the same as $100,497 in Lincoln; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair VA:NE 91.1→91.6
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Staunton-Stuarts Draft, VA and Lincoln, NE are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Lincoln is 16.0 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Staunton-Stuarts Draft corresponds to $100,497 in Lincoln.
Diff +0.5 RPP
Diff -2.7 RPP
Diff -12.7 RPP
Diff +16.0 RPP
| Category | Staunton-Stuarts Draft | Lincoln | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.1 | 91.6 | +0.5 |
| Goods | 96.8 | 94.1 | -2.7 |
| Services | 89.5 | 76.8 | -12.7 |
| Rents | 68.2 | 84.2 | +16.0 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Staunton-Stuarts Draft would need to be in Lincoln for the same purchasing power:
| In Staunton-Stuarts Draft | In Lincoln | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,249 | +$249 |
| $75,000 | $75,373 | +$373 |
| $100,000 | $100,497 | +$497 |
| $150,000 | $150,746 | +$746 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.1 → 91.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Lincoln is 0.5% more expensive than Staunton-Stuarts Draft. The overall cost index is 91.6 vs 91.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Staunton-Stuarts Draft has the same purchasing power as $100,497 in Lincoln. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Staunton-Stuarts Draft are indexed at 68.2 while Lincoln is at 84.2 (national average = 100). Lincoln has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.