Overall
- Lincoln
- 91.6
Diff -0.5 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Staunton-Stuarts Draft is 0.5% less expensive than Lincoln.
Staunton-Stuarts Draft, VA is 0.5% less expensive than Lincoln, NE on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.1 vs 91.6). A $100,000 salary in Lincoln buys about the same as $99,505 in Staunton-Stuarts Draft; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair NE:VA 91.6→91.1
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Lincoln, NE and Staunton-Stuarts Draft, VA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Staunton-Stuarts Draft is 16.0 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Lincoln corresponds to $99,505 in Staunton-Stuarts Draft.
Diff -0.5 RPP
Diff +2.7 RPP
Diff +12.7 RPP
Diff -16.0 RPP
| Category | Lincoln | Staunton-Stuarts Draft | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.6 | 91.1 | -0.5 |
| Goods | 94.1 | 96.8 | +2.7 |
| Services | 76.8 | 89.5 | +12.7 |
| Rents | 84.2 | 68.2 | -16.0 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Lincoln would need to be in Staunton-Stuarts Draft for the same purchasing power:
| In Lincoln | In Staunton-Stuarts Draft | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,753 | $-247 |
| $75,000 | $74,629 | $-371 |
| $100,000 | $99,505 | $-495 |
| $150,000 | $149,258 | $-742 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.6 → 91.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Staunton-Stuarts Draft is 0.5% less expensive than Lincoln. The overall cost index is 91.1 vs 91.6 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Lincoln has the same purchasing power as $99,505 in Staunton-Stuarts Draft. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Lincoln are indexed at 84.2 while Staunton-Stuarts Draft is at 68.2 (national average = 100). Lincoln has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.