Staunton-Stuarts Draft vs Bismarck

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Bismarck is 0.1% less expensive than Staunton-Stuarts Draft.

0.1% less expensive

Bismarck, ND is 0.1% less expensive than Staunton-Stuarts Draft, VA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.0 vs 91.1). A $100,000 salary in Staunton-Stuarts Draft buys about the same as $99,886 in Bismarck; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 91.1 (Staunton-Stuarts Draft) vs 91.0 (Bismarck)
  • $100k in Staunton-Stuarts Draft ≈ $99,886 purchasing power in Bismarck
  • Rents drives the gap (+15.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair VA:ND 91.1→91.0

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE VA × ND
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Staunton-Stuarts Draft
91.1
Cost Index
Bismarck
91.0
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Staunton-Stuarts Draft, VA and Bismarck, ND are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Bismarck is 15.8 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Staunton-Stuarts Draft corresponds to $99,886 in Bismarck.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Staunton-Stuarts Draft
91.1
Bismarck
91.0
Goods
Staunton-Stuarts Draft
96.8
Bismarck
95.7
Services
Staunton-Stuarts Draft
89.5
Bismarck
75.0
Rents
Staunton-Stuarts Draft
68.2
Bismarck
84.0

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Staunton-Stuarts Draft would need to be in Bismarck for the same purchasing power:

In Staunton-Stuarts Draft In Bismarck Difference
$50,000 $49,943 $-57
$75,000 $74,914 $-86
$100,000 $99,886 $-114
$150,000 $149,829 $-171
$ in Staunton-Stuarts Draft = in Bismarck

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.1 → 91.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Bismarck more expensive than Staunton-Stuarts Draft?

Bismarck is 0.1% less expensive than Staunton-Stuarts Draft. The overall cost index is 91.0 vs 91.1 (national average = 100).

What salary in Bismarck equals $100K in Staunton-Stuarts Draft?

A $100,000 salary in Staunton-Stuarts Draft has the same purchasing power as $99,886 in Bismarck. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Staunton-Stuarts Draft and Bismarck?

Rents in Staunton-Stuarts Draft are indexed at 68.2 while Bismarck is at 84.0 (national average = 100). Bismarck has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.