Overall
- Bismarck
- 91.0
Diff -0.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Bismarck is 0.1% less expensive than Staunton-Stuarts Draft.
Bismarck, ND is 0.1% less expensive than Staunton-Stuarts Draft, VA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.0 vs 91.1). A $100,000 salary in Staunton-Stuarts Draft buys about the same as $99,886 in Bismarck; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair VA:ND 91.1→91.0
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Staunton-Stuarts Draft, VA and Bismarck, ND are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Bismarck is 15.8 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Staunton-Stuarts Draft corresponds to $99,886 in Bismarck.
Diff -0.1 RPP
Diff -1.1 RPP
Diff -14.5 RPP
Diff +15.8 RPP
| Category | Staunton-Stuarts Draft | Bismarck | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.1 | 91.0 | -0.1 |
| Goods | 96.8 | 95.7 | -1.1 |
| Services | 89.5 | 75.0 | -14.5 |
| Rents | 68.2 | 84.0 | +15.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Staunton-Stuarts Draft would need to be in Bismarck for the same purchasing power:
| In Staunton-Stuarts Draft | In Bismarck | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,943 | $-57 |
| $75,000 | $74,914 | $-86 |
| $100,000 | $99,886 | $-114 |
| $150,000 | $149,829 | $-171 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.1 → 91.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Bismarck is 0.1% less expensive than Staunton-Stuarts Draft. The overall cost index is 91.0 vs 91.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Staunton-Stuarts Draft has the same purchasing power as $99,886 in Bismarck. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Staunton-Stuarts Draft are indexed at 68.2 while Bismarck is at 84.0 (national average = 100). Bismarck has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.