Overall
- Bismarck
- 91.0
Diff +0.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Staunton-Stuarts Draft is 0.1% more expensive than Bismarck.
Staunton-Stuarts Draft, VA is 0.1% more expensive than Bismarck, ND on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.1 vs 91.0). A $100,000 salary in Bismarck buys about the same as $100,114 in Staunton-Stuarts Draft; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair ND:VA 91.0→91.1
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Bismarck, ND and Staunton-Stuarts Draft, VA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Staunton-Stuarts Draft is 15.8 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Bismarck corresponds to $100,114 in Staunton-Stuarts Draft.
Diff +0.1 RPP
Diff +1.1 RPP
Diff +14.5 RPP
Diff -15.8 RPP
| Category | Bismarck | Staunton-Stuarts Draft | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.0 | 91.1 | +0.1 |
| Goods | 95.7 | 96.8 | +1.1 |
| Services | 75.0 | 89.5 | +14.5 |
| Rents | 84.0 | 68.2 | -15.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Bismarck would need to be in Staunton-Stuarts Draft for the same purchasing power:
| In Bismarck | In Staunton-Stuarts Draft | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,057 | +$57 |
| $75,000 | $75,086 | +$86 |
| $100,000 | $100,114 | +$114 |
| $150,000 | $150,171 | +$171 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.0 → 91.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Staunton-Stuarts Draft is 0.1% more expensive than Bismarck. The overall cost index is 91.1 vs 91.0 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Bismarck has the same purchasing power as $100,114 in Staunton-Stuarts Draft. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Bismarck are indexed at 84.0 while Staunton-Stuarts Draft is at 68.2 (national average = 100). Bismarck has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.