Bismarck vs Staunton-Stuarts Draft

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Staunton-Stuarts Draft is 0.1% more expensive than Bismarck.

0.1% more expensive

Staunton-Stuarts Draft, VA is 0.1% more expensive than Bismarck, ND on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.1 vs 91.0). A $100,000 salary in Bismarck buys about the same as $100,114 in Staunton-Stuarts Draft; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 91.0 (Bismarck) vs 91.1 (Staunton-Stuarts Draft)
  • $100k in Bismarck ≈ $100,114 purchasing power in Staunton-Stuarts Draft
  • Rents drives the gap (-15.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair ND:VA 91.0→91.1

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE ND × VA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Bismarck
91.0
Cost Index
Staunton-Stuarts Draft
91.1
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Bismarck, ND and Staunton-Stuarts Draft, VA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Staunton-Stuarts Draft is 15.8 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Bismarck corresponds to $100,114 in Staunton-Stuarts Draft.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Bismarck
91.0
Staunton-Stuarts Draft
91.1
Goods
Bismarck
95.7
Staunton-Stuarts Draft
96.8
Services
Bismarck
75.0
Staunton-Stuarts Draft
89.5
Rents
Bismarck
84.0
Staunton-Stuarts Draft
68.2

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Bismarck would need to be in Staunton-Stuarts Draft for the same purchasing power:

In Bismarck In Staunton-Stuarts Draft Difference
$50,000 $50,057 +$57
$75,000 $75,086 +$86
$100,000 $100,114 +$114
$150,000 $150,171 +$171
$ in Bismarck = in Staunton-Stuarts Draft

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.0 → 91.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Staunton-Stuarts Draft more expensive than Bismarck?

Staunton-Stuarts Draft is 0.1% more expensive than Bismarck. The overall cost index is 91.1 vs 91.0 (national average = 100).

What salary in Staunton-Stuarts Draft equals $100K in Bismarck?

A $100,000 salary in Bismarck has the same purchasing power as $100,114 in Staunton-Stuarts Draft. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Bismarck and Staunton-Stuarts Draft?

Rents in Bismarck are indexed at 84.0 while Staunton-Stuarts Draft is at 68.2 (national average = 100). Bismarck has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.