Overall
- Bismarck
- 91.0
- Clarksville
- 90.9
Diff -0.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Clarksville is 0.1% less expensive than Bismarck.
Clarksville, TN-KY is 0.1% less expensive than Bismarck, ND on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.9 vs 91.0). A $100,000 salary in Bismarck buys about the same as $99,915 in Clarksville; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair ND:TN 91.0→90.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Bismarck, ND and Clarksville, TN-KY are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Clarksville is 10.2 points lower. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Bismarck corresponds to $99,915 in Clarksville.
Diff -0.1 RPP
Diff +0.5 RPP
Diff -2.5 RPP
Diff -10.2 RPP
| Category | Bismarck | Clarksville | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.0 | 90.9 | -0.1 |
| Goods | 95.7 | 96.2 | +0.5 |
| Services | 75.0 | 72.5 | -2.5 |
| Rents | 84.0 | 73.8 | -10.2 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Bismarck and Clarksville share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 0.5 to 0.1 RPP points. Bismarck remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 22.8 points between the first and latest shared releases (12.5 to 10.2 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Bismarck RPP | Clarksville RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 90.0 | 90.5 | 0.5 points Clarksville higher |
| 2012 | 95.2 | 93.0 | 2.3 points Bismarck higher |
| 2016 | 96.0 | 93.6 | 2.4 points Bismarck higher |
| 2020 | 92.6 | 88.8 | 3.9 points Bismarck higher |
| 2024 | 91.0 | 90.9 | 0.1 points Bismarck higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Bismarck would need to be in Clarksville for the same purchasing power:
| In Bismarck | In Clarksville | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,958 | $-42 |
| $75,000 | $74,937 | $-63 |
| $100,000 | $99,915 | $-85 |
| $150,000 | $149,873 | $-127 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.0 → 90.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Clarksville is 0.1% less expensive than Bismarck. The overall cost index is 90.9 vs 91.0 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Bismarck has the same purchasing power as $99,915 in Clarksville. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Bismarck are indexed at 84.0 while Clarksville is at 73.8 (national average = 100). Bismarck has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.