Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom vs Vallejo

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Vallejo is 1.7% more expensive than Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom.

1.7% more expensive

Vallejo, CA is 1.7% more expensive than Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 108.5 vs 106.7). A $100,000 salary in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom buys about the same as $101,696 in Vallejo; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 106.7 (Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom) vs 108.5 (Vallejo)
  • $100k in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom ≈ $101,696 purchasing power in Vallejo
  • Rents drives the gap (+11.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair CA:CA 106.7→108.5

PHOTO-FINISH · SAME-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • SAME-STATE Same state · CA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
106.7
Cost Index
Vallejo
108.5
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA and Vallejo, CA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.8 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Vallejo is 11.8 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom corresponds to $101,696 in Vallejo.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
106.7
Vallejo
108.5
Goods
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
105.2
Vallejo
105.2
Services
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
151.3
Vallejo
155.0
Rents
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
130.2
Vallejo
142.0

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom would need to be in Vallejo for the same purchasing power:

In Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom In Vallejo Difference
$50,000 $50,848 +$848
$75,000 $76,272 +$1,272
$100,000 $101,696 +$1,696
$150,000 $152,544 +$2,544
$ in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom = in Vallejo

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (106.7 → 108.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Vallejo more expensive than Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom?

Vallejo is 1.7% more expensive than Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom. The overall cost index is 108.5 vs 106.7 (national average = 100).

What salary in Vallejo equals $100K in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom?

A $100,000 salary in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom has the same purchasing power as $101,696 in Vallejo. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom and Vallejo?

Rents in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom are indexed at 130.2 while Vallejo is at 142.0 (national average = 100). Vallejo has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.