Overall
Diff -0.6 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lawrence is 0.6% less expensive than Rochester.
Lawrence, KS is 0.6% less expensive than Rochester, MN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.2 vs 90.8). A $100,000 salary in Rochester buys about the same as $99,364 in Lawrence; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair MN:KS 90.8→90.2
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Rochester, MN and Lawrence, KS are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.6 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Lawrence is 7.0 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Rochester corresponds to $99,364 in Lawrence.
Diff -0.6 RPP
Diff -1.4 RPP
Diff +1.9 RPP
Diff -7.0 RPP
| Category | Rochester | Lawrence | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 90.8 | 90.2 | -0.6 |
| Goods | 95.4 | 94.0 | -1.4 |
| Services | 87.4 | 89.3 | +1.9 |
| Rents | 78.6 | 71.6 | -7.0 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rochester and Lawrence share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 3.0 to 0.6 RPP points. Rochester remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 8.5 points between the first and latest shared releases (1.5 to 7.0 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Rochester RPP | Lawrence RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 95.2 | 98.2 | 3.0 points Lawrence higher |
| 2012 | 94.5 | 96.0 | 1.5 points Lawrence higher |
| 2016 | 92.8 | 94.1 | 1.3 points Lawrence higher |
| 2020 | 96.7 | 94.0 | 2.7 points Rochester higher |
| 2024 | 90.8 | 90.2 | 0.6 points Rochester higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Rochester would need to be in Lawrence for the same purchasing power:
| In Rochester | In Lawrence | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,682 | $-318 |
| $75,000 | $74,523 | $-477 |
| $100,000 | $99,364 | $-636 |
| $150,000 | $149,045 | $-955 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.8 → 90.2), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Lawrence is 0.6% less expensive than Rochester. The overall cost index is 90.2 vs 90.8 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Rochester has the same purchasing power as $99,364 in Lawrence. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Rochester are indexed at 78.6 while Lawrence is at 71.6 (national average = 100). Rochester has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.