Pittsfield vs Salem

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Salem is 9% more expensive than Pittsfield.

9% more expensive

Salem, OR is 9% more expensive than Pittsfield, MA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.6 vs 95.1). A $100,000 salary in Pittsfield buys about the same as $108,983 in Salem; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 95.1 (Pittsfield) vs 103.6 (Salem)
  • $100k in Pittsfield ≈ $108,983 purchasing power in Salem
  • Services drives the gap (-49.0 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair MA:OR 95.1→103.6

TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
  • CROSS-STATE MA × OR
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Pittsfield
95.1
Salem
103.6
Goods
Pittsfield
97.0
Salem
105.3
Services
Pittsfield
153.7
Salem
104.7
Rents
Pittsfield
73.5
Salem
110.3

Vertical line = national average (100)

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Services creates the largest separation: Salem is 49.0 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Pittsfield, MA and Salem, OR sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 8.5 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.

This route crosses the national benchmark: Salem is above 100 while Pittsfield is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Pittsfield to $108,983 in Salem, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Pittsfield
95.1
Cost Index
Salem
103.6
Cost Index

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Pittsfield would need to be in Salem for the same purchasing power:

In Pittsfield In Salem Difference
$50,000 $54,491 +$4,491
$75,000 $81,737 +$6,737
$100,000 $108,983 +$8,983
$150,000 $163,474 +$13,474
$ in Pittsfield = in Salem

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.1 → 103.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

How the Price Gap Changed

Pittsfield and Salem share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 5.5 to 8.5 RPP points. Salem remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 44.8 points between the first and latest shared releases (8.0 to 36.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Pittsfield RPP Salem RPP Relative Gap
2008 99.6 94.1 5.5 points Pittsfield higher
2012 97.8 101.1 3.3 points Salem higher
2016 100.5 97.1 3.4 points Pittsfield higher
2020 99.5 100.9 1.5 points Salem higher
2024 95.1 103.6 8.5 points Salem higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Salem more expensive than Pittsfield?

Salem is 9% more expensive than Pittsfield. The overall cost index is 103.6 vs 95.1 (national average = 100).

What salary in Salem equals $100K in Pittsfield?

A $100,000 salary in Pittsfield has the same purchasing power as $108,983 in Salem. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Pittsfield and Salem?

Rents in Pittsfield are indexed at 73.5 while Salem is at 110.3 (national average = 100). Salem has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.