Overall
- Pittsfield
- 95.1
- Bend
- 103.6
Diff +8.5 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Bend is 8.9% more expensive than Pittsfield.
Bend, OR is 8.9% more expensive than Pittsfield, MA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.6 vs 95.1). A $100,000 salary in Pittsfield buys about the same as $108,938 in Bend; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair MA:OR 95.1→103.6
TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff +8.5 RPP
Diff +8.2 RPP
Diff -48.7 RPP
Diff +36.5 RPP
| Category | Pittsfield | Bend | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.1 | 103.6 | +8.5 |
| Goods | 97.0 | 105.3 | +8.2 |
| Services | 153.7 | 105.0 | -48.7 |
| Rents | 73.5 | 110.0 | +36.5 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Services creates the largest separation: Bend is 48.7 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Pittsfield, MA and Bend, OR sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 8.5 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Bend is above 100 while Pittsfield is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Pittsfield to $108,938 in Bend, but it is not a personal spending weight.
What a salary in Pittsfield would need to be in Bend for the same purchasing power:
| In Pittsfield | In Bend | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $54,469 | +$4,469 |
| $75,000 | $81,704 | +$6,704 |
| $100,000 | $108,938 | +$8,938 |
| $150,000 | $163,408 | +$13,408 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.1 → 103.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Pittsfield and Bend share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 0.1 to 8.5 RPP points. Bend remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 31.9 points between the first and latest shared releases (4.6 to 36.5 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Pittsfield RPP | Bend RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 99.6 | 99.8 | 0.1 points Bend higher |
| 2012 | 97.8 | 95.8 | 2.0 points Pittsfield higher |
| 2016 | 100.5 | 99.0 | 1.5 points Pittsfield higher |
| 2020 | 99.5 | 102.9 | 3.5 points Bend higher |
| 2024 | 95.1 | 103.6 | 8.5 points Bend higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Bend is 8.9% more expensive than Pittsfield. The overall cost index is 103.6 vs 95.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Pittsfield has the same purchasing power as $108,938 in Bend. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Pittsfield are indexed at 73.5 while Bend is at 110.0 (national average = 100). Bend has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.