Overall
- Pittsfield
- 95.1
- Bloomington
- 95.1
Diff -0.0 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Bloomington is 0% less expensive than Pittsfield.
Bloomington, IN is 0% less expensive than Pittsfield, MA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.1 vs 95.1). A $100,000 salary in Pittsfield buys about the same as $99,977 in Bloomington; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair MA:IN 95.1→95.1
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Pittsfield, MA and Bloomington, IN are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.0 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Bloomington is 67.2 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Pittsfield to $99,977 in Bloomington, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff -0.0 RPP
Diff -2.7 RPP
Diff -67.2 RPP
Diff +12.1 RPP
| Category | Pittsfield | Bloomington | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.1 | 95.1 | -0.0 |
| Goods | 97.0 | 94.3 | -2.7 |
| Services | 153.7 | 86.5 | -67.2 |
| Rents | 73.5 | 85.6 | +12.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Pittsfield would need to be in Bloomington for the same purchasing power:
| In Pittsfield | In Bloomington | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,988 | $-12 |
| $75,000 | $74,983 | $-17 |
| $100,000 | $99,977 | $-23 |
| $150,000 | $149,965 | $-35 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.1 → 95.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Bloomington is 0% less expensive than Pittsfield. The overall cost index is 95.1 vs 95.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Pittsfield has the same purchasing power as $99,977 in Bloomington. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Pittsfield are indexed at 73.5 while Bloomington is at 85.6 (national average = 100). Bloomington has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.