Overall
- Pittsfield
- 95.1
- Naples-Marco Island
- 103.2
Diff +8.1 RPP
Pittsfield vs Naples-Marco Island
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Naples-Marco Island is 8.5% more expensive than Pittsfield.
8.5% more expensive
Naples-Marco Island, FL is 8.5% more expensive than Pittsfield, MA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.2 vs 95.1). A $100,000 salary in Pittsfield buys about the same as $108,511 in Naples-Marco Island; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 95.1 (Pittsfield) vs 103.2 (Naples-Marco Island)
- $100k in Pittsfield ≈ $108,511 purchasing power in Naples-Marco Island
- Services drives the gap (-66.0 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair MA:FL 95.1→103.2
TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
- CROSS-STATE MA × FL
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Pittsfield
- 97.0
- Naples-Marco Island
- 96.2
Diff -0.8 RPP
Services
- Pittsfield
- 153.7
- Naples-Marco Island
- 87.8
Diff -66.0 RPP
Rents
- Pittsfield
- 73.5
- Naples-Marco Island
- 129.4
Diff +56.0 RPP
| Category | Pittsfield | Naples-Marco Island | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.1 | 103.2 | +8.1 |
| Goods | 97.0 | 96.2 | -0.8 |
| Services | 153.7 | 87.8 | -66.0 |
| Rents | 73.5 | 129.4 | +56.0 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Pittsfield 95.1
Naples-Marco Island 103.2
Goods
Pittsfield 97.0
Naples-Marco Island 96.2
Services
Pittsfield 153.7
Naples-Marco Island 87.8
Rents
Pittsfield 73.5
Naples-Marco Island 129.4
Vertical line = national average (100)
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Services creates the largest separation: Naples-Marco Island is 66.0 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Pittsfield, MA and Naples-Marco Island, FL sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 8.1 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Naples-Marco Island is above 100 while Pittsfield is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Pittsfield to $108,511 in Naples-Marco Island, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Pittsfield
95.1
Cost Index
Naples-Marco Island
103.2
Cost Index
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Pittsfield would need to be in Naples-Marco Island for the same purchasing power:
| In Pittsfield | In Naples-Marco Island | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $54,255 | +$4,255 |
| $75,000 | $81,383 | +$6,383 |
| $100,000 | $108,511 | +$8,511 |
| $150,000 | $162,766 | +$12,766 |
$ in Pittsfield = in Naples-Marco Island
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.1 → 103.2), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
How the Price Gap Changed
Pittsfield and Naples-Marco Island share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 4.7 to 8.1 RPP points. Naples-Marco Island remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 21.2 points between the first and latest shared releases (44.7 to 66.0 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Pittsfield RPP | Naples-Marco Island RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 99.6 | 104.3 | 4.7 points Naples-Marco Island higher |
| 2012 | 97.8 | 101.6 | 3.8 points Naples-Marco Island higher |
| 2016 | 100.5 | 103.8 | 3.3 points Naples-Marco Island higher |
| 2020 | 99.5 | 99.1 | 0.4 points Pittsfield higher |
| 2024 | 95.1 | 103.2 | 8.1 points Naples-Marco Island higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Naples-Marco Island more expensive than Pittsfield?
Naples-Marco Island is 8.5% more expensive than Pittsfield. The overall cost index is 103.2 vs 95.1 (national average = 100).
What salary in Naples-Marco Island equals $100K in Pittsfield?
A $100,000 salary in Pittsfield has the same purchasing power as $108,511 in Naples-Marco Island. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Pittsfield and Naples-Marco Island?
Rents in Pittsfield are indexed at 73.5 while Naples-Marco Island is at 129.4 (national average = 100). Naples-Marco Island has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.