Overall
- Oshkosh-Neenah
- 92.9
- Yuma
- 92.7
Diff -0.2 RPP
Oshkosh-Neenah vs Yuma
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Yuma is 0.2% less expensive than Oshkosh-Neenah.
0.2% less expensive
Yuma, AZ is 0.2% less expensive than Oshkosh-Neenah, WI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.7 vs 92.9). A $100,000 salary in Oshkosh-Neenah buys about the same as $99,760 in Yuma; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 92.9 (Oshkosh-Neenah) vs 92.7 (Yuma)
- $100k in Oshkosh-Neenah ≈ $99,760 purchasing power in Yuma
- Services drives the gap (-2.8 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair WI:AZ 92.9→92.7
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE WI × AZ
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Oshkosh-Neenah
92.9
Cost Index
Yuma
92.7
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Oshkosh-Neenah, WI and Yuma, AZ are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Yuma is 2.8 points lower. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Oshkosh-Neenah to $99,760 in Yuma, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Oshkosh-Neenah
- 93.8
- Yuma
- 96.2
Diff +2.4 RPP
Services
- Oshkosh-Neenah
- 90.6
- Yuma
- 87.8
Diff -2.8 RPP
Rents
- Oshkosh-Neenah
- 74.4
- Yuma
- 73.8
Diff -0.7 RPP
| Category | Oshkosh-Neenah | Yuma | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 92.9 | 92.7 | -0.2 |
| Goods | 93.8 | 96.2 | +2.4 |
| Services | 90.6 | 87.8 | -2.8 |
| Rents | 74.4 | 73.8 | -0.7 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Oshkosh-Neenah 92.9
Yuma 92.7
Goods
Oshkosh-Neenah 93.8
Yuma 96.2
Services
Oshkosh-Neenah 90.6
Yuma 87.8
Rents
Oshkosh-Neenah 74.4
Yuma 73.8
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Oshkosh-Neenah would need to be in Yuma for the same purchasing power:
| In Oshkosh-Neenah | In Yuma | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,880 | $-120 |
| $75,000 | $74,820 | $-180 |
| $100,000 | $99,760 | $-240 |
| $150,000 | $149,640 | $-360 |
$ in Oshkosh-Neenah = in Yuma
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.9 → 92.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Yuma more expensive than Oshkosh-Neenah?
Yuma is 0.2% less expensive than Oshkosh-Neenah. The overall cost index is 92.7 vs 92.9 (national average = 100).
What salary in Yuma equals $100K in Oshkosh-Neenah?
A $100,000 salary in Oshkosh-Neenah has the same purchasing power as $99,760 in Yuma. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Oshkosh-Neenah and Yuma?
Rents in Oshkosh-Neenah are indexed at 74.4 while Yuma is at 73.8 (national average = 100). Oshkosh-Neenah has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.