Overall
- Oshkosh-Neenah
- 92.9
Diff -0.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Greensboro-High Point is 0.1% less expensive than Oshkosh-Neenah.
Greensboro-High Point, NC is 0.1% less expensive than Oshkosh-Neenah, WI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.9 vs 92.9). A $100,000 salary in Oshkosh-Neenah buys about the same as $99,931 in Greensboro-High Point; the largest component gap is goods.
RPP parity plate
Pair WI:NC 92.9→92.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Oshkosh-Neenah, WI and Greensboro-High Point, NC are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Goods creates the largest separation: Greensboro-High Point is 2.8 points higher. But goods and rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a goods-led difference, remember that many tradable prices vary less by address than housing or labor-priced services. Use $99,931 in Greensboro-High Point as the BEA equivalent of $100,000 in Oshkosh-Neenah, then replace the national basket with your own.
Diff -0.1 RPP
Diff +2.8 RPP
Diff -1.5 RPP
Diff +0.1 RPP
| Category | Oshkosh-Neenah | Greensboro-High Point | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 92.9 | 92.9 | -0.1 |
| Goods | 93.8 | 96.6 | +2.8 |
| Services | 90.6 | 89.1 | -1.5 |
| Rents | 74.4 | 74.5 | +0.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Oshkosh-Neenah and Greensboro-High Point share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 4.5 to 0.1 RPP points. Oshkosh-Neenah remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 13.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (15.2 to 1.5 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Oshkosh-Neenah RPP | Greensboro-High Point RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 97.1 | 92.6 | 4.5 points Oshkosh-Neenah higher |
| 2012 | 94.4 | 93.4 | 1.1 points Oshkosh-Neenah higher |
| 2016 | 93.0 | 92.7 | 0.3 points Oshkosh-Neenah higher |
| 2020 | 92.6 | 89.4 | 3.2 points Oshkosh-Neenah higher |
| 2024 | 92.9 | 92.9 | 0.1 points Oshkosh-Neenah higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Oshkosh-Neenah would need to be in Greensboro-High Point for the same purchasing power:
| In Oshkosh-Neenah | In Greensboro-High Point | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,966 | $-34 |
| $75,000 | $74,948 | $-52 |
| $100,000 | $99,931 | $-69 |
| $150,000 | $149,897 | $-103 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.9 → 92.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Greensboro-High Point is 0.1% less expensive than Oshkosh-Neenah. The overall cost index is 92.9 vs 92.9 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Oshkosh-Neenah has the same purchasing power as $99,931 in Greensboro-High Point. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Oshkosh-Neenah are indexed at 74.4 while Greensboro-High Point is at 74.5 (national average = 100). Greensboro-High Point has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.