Overall
- Yuma
- 92.7
- Oshkosh-Neenah
- 92.9
Diff +0.2 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Oshkosh-Neenah is 0.2% more expensive than Yuma.
Oshkosh-Neenah, WI is 0.2% more expensive than Yuma, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.9 vs 92.7). A $100,000 salary in Yuma buys about the same as $100,241 in Oshkosh-Neenah; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair AZ:WI 92.7→92.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Yuma, AZ and Oshkosh-Neenah, WI are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Oshkosh-Neenah is 2.8 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Yuma to $100,241 in Oshkosh-Neenah, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff -2.4 RPP
Diff +2.8 RPP
Diff +0.7 RPP
| Category | Yuma | Oshkosh-Neenah | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 92.7 | 92.9 | +0.2 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 93.8 | -2.4 |
| Services | 87.8 | 90.6 | +2.8 |
| Rents | 73.8 | 74.4 | +0.7 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Yuma and Oshkosh-Neenah share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 4.7 to 0.2 RPP points. Oshkosh-Neenah remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 11.3 points between the first and latest shared releases (14.1 to 2.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Yuma RPP | Oshkosh-Neenah RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 92.4 | 97.1 | 4.7 points Oshkosh-Neenah higher |
| 2012 | 93.8 | 94.4 | 0.6 points Oshkosh-Neenah higher |
| 2016 | 92.7 | 93.0 | 0.3 points Oshkosh-Neenah higher |
| 2020 | 88.7 | 92.6 | 3.9 points Oshkosh-Neenah higher |
| 2024 | 92.7 | 92.9 | 0.2 points Oshkosh-Neenah higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Yuma would need to be in Oshkosh-Neenah for the same purchasing power:
| In Yuma | In Oshkosh-Neenah | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,120 | +$120 |
| $75,000 | $75,180 | +$180 |
| $100,000 | $100,241 | +$241 |
| $150,000 | $150,361 | +$361 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.7 → 92.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Oshkosh-Neenah is 0.2% more expensive than Yuma. The overall cost index is 92.9 vs 92.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Yuma has the same purchasing power as $100,241 in Oshkosh-Neenah. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Yuma are indexed at 73.8 while Oshkosh-Neenah is at 74.4 (national average = 100). Oshkosh-Neenah has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.